“…50,51 The X-ray structure of 6 is shown in 52 Moreover, Hidai et al synthesized a series of heterobimetallic dinitrogen complexes containing group 6 and group 4 or 5 transition metals. 30,31 These complexes can be regarded as formal [N 2 S13). The vanadium and chromium 2p XPS spectra show that the binding energies of complex 6 are 515.7 and 575.5 eV, respectively.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Cummins et al reported the Mo–Ti μ-N 2 complex [(Ar[R]N) 3 Mo(μ-N 2 )Nb(N[ i Pr]Ar) 3 (R = t Bu or C(CD 3 ) 2 CH 3 )] (NN = 1.235(10) Å) . Moreover, Hidai et al synthesized a series of heterobimetallic dinitrogen complexes containing group 6 and group 4 or 5 transition metals. , These complexes can be regarded as formal [N 2 2– -bridged M1–N 2 –M2 complex, and their N–N distances fall within 1.21(2)∼1.275(9) Å. The UV–vis spectrum absorption bands of Cp*Cr(depe)(μ-N 2 )V(Et 2 O) Tipp [O, P, O] 6 are at 606 and 707 nm (Figure S13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All chemical shifts were reported in units of parts per million with references to the residual protons of the deuterated solvents for proton chemical shifts and the 13 C of deuterated solvents for carbon chemical shifts. 31 P chemical shifts are reported in ppm relative to 85% aqueous H 3 PO 4 . 15 N chemical shifts are reported in ppm relative to liquid NH 3 at 0 ppm.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first involved the insertion of the M1–N 2 fragment into the metal-halide bonds of M2(X) to generate the M1(X)–N 2 –M2 complexes. Hidai et al and Simonneau et al reported a series of heterobimetallic μ-N 2 complexes, systematically synthesized through the reaction of end-on Mo 0 and W 0 dinitrogen complexes with high-valent organometallic halides. − The second approach was the transmetalation reaction, whereby the cation (Li or Mg) of a metal–dinitrogen complex was transformed into another metal through a transmetalation process. For example, in 1999, Schrock and co-workers demonstrated the preparation of heterobimetallic dinitrogen complex that contains the {[N 3 N]Mo–N 2 } − ligand by reacting {[N 3 N]Mo–N 2 } 2 Mg(THF) 2 with transition metal halides. , The third strategy pertained to the formation of formal Lewis pairs via coordination of Lewis acid complexes to the terminal TM–N 2 complexes.…”
In
the domain of N2 activation, hetero-bimetallic
dinitrogen
complexes are garnering substantial interest due to their potential
to induce polarization in nonpolar N2 gas. Herein, we present
the syntheses and characterizations of three novel hetero-multimetallic
dinitrogen complexes: Cp*Cr(depe)N2V(depe)
Me
[O, P, O] 5, Cp*Cr(depe)N2V(depe)
Tipp
[O, P, O] 6,
and [Cp*Cr(depe)N2]2Ti
Tipp
[O, P, O] 7. These complexes were synthesized
via a transmetalation process involving the treatment of [Cr0–N2]− complex 4 with
vanadium and titanium chloride complexes bearing alkyl or aryl substituted
bis(o-hydroxyphenyl)-phenyl phosphine
R
[O, P, O] ligand (alkyl = methyl, aryl = 2,4,6-tri-isopropylbenzene).
X-ray analysis shows that complexes 5 and 6 exhibit heterodinuclear structures, while complex 7 exhibits a heterotrinuclear core with two N2 ligands
concurrently coordinated to two chromium and one titanium atoms. Raman
spectroscopic data show that the N–N stretching vibration of
the N2 moiety is clearly downshifted relative to free N2 and to mononuclear [Cr0–N2]− complex 4.
“…50,51 The X-ray structure of 6 is shown in 52 Moreover, Hidai et al synthesized a series of heterobimetallic dinitrogen complexes containing group 6 and group 4 or 5 transition metals. 30,31 These complexes can be regarded as formal [N 2 S13). The vanadium and chromium 2p XPS spectra show that the binding energies of complex 6 are 515.7 and 575.5 eV, respectively.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Cummins et al reported the Mo–Ti μ-N 2 complex [(Ar[R]N) 3 Mo(μ-N 2 )Nb(N[ i Pr]Ar) 3 (R = t Bu or C(CD 3 ) 2 CH 3 )] (NN = 1.235(10) Å) . Moreover, Hidai et al synthesized a series of heterobimetallic dinitrogen complexes containing group 6 and group 4 or 5 transition metals. , These complexes can be regarded as formal [N 2 2– -bridged M1–N 2 –M2 complex, and their N–N distances fall within 1.21(2)∼1.275(9) Å. The UV–vis spectrum absorption bands of Cp*Cr(depe)(μ-N 2 )V(Et 2 O) Tipp [O, P, O] 6 are at 606 and 707 nm (Figure S13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All chemical shifts were reported in units of parts per million with references to the residual protons of the deuterated solvents for proton chemical shifts and the 13 C of deuterated solvents for carbon chemical shifts. 31 P chemical shifts are reported in ppm relative to 85% aqueous H 3 PO 4 . 15 N chemical shifts are reported in ppm relative to liquid NH 3 at 0 ppm.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first involved the insertion of the M1–N 2 fragment into the metal-halide bonds of M2(X) to generate the M1(X)–N 2 –M2 complexes. Hidai et al and Simonneau et al reported a series of heterobimetallic μ-N 2 complexes, systematically synthesized through the reaction of end-on Mo 0 and W 0 dinitrogen complexes with high-valent organometallic halides. − The second approach was the transmetalation reaction, whereby the cation (Li or Mg) of a metal–dinitrogen complex was transformed into another metal through a transmetalation process. For example, in 1999, Schrock and co-workers demonstrated the preparation of heterobimetallic dinitrogen complex that contains the {[N 3 N]Mo–N 2 } − ligand by reacting {[N 3 N]Mo–N 2 } 2 Mg(THF) 2 with transition metal halides. , The third strategy pertained to the formation of formal Lewis pairs via coordination of Lewis acid complexes to the terminal TM–N 2 complexes.…”
In
the domain of N2 activation, hetero-bimetallic
dinitrogen
complexes are garnering substantial interest due to their potential
to induce polarization in nonpolar N2 gas. Herein, we present
the syntheses and characterizations of three novel hetero-multimetallic
dinitrogen complexes: Cp*Cr(depe)N2V(depe)
Me
[O, P, O] 5, Cp*Cr(depe)N2V(depe)
Tipp
[O, P, O] 6,
and [Cp*Cr(depe)N2]2Ti
Tipp
[O, P, O] 7. These complexes were synthesized
via a transmetalation process involving the treatment of [Cr0–N2]− complex 4 with
vanadium and titanium chloride complexes bearing alkyl or aryl substituted
bis(o-hydroxyphenyl)-phenyl phosphine
R
[O, P, O] ligand (alkyl = methyl, aryl = 2,4,6-tri-isopropylbenzene).
X-ray analysis shows that complexes 5 and 6 exhibit heterodinuclear structures, while complex 7 exhibits a heterotrinuclear core with two N2 ligands
concurrently coordinated to two chromium and one titanium atoms. Raman
spectroscopic data show that the N–N stretching vibration of
the N2 moiety is clearly downshifted relative to free N2 and to mononuclear [Cr0–N2]− complex 4.
“…4,5 N 2 bridged heterometallic complexes were reported in seminal studies more than 50 years ago [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] but the use of mid-tolate d-elements such as iron 16,17 remains rare. Recently, N 2 bridged heterobimetallic complexes [18][19][20][21][22] have attracted increasing interest in transition metal chemistry for their potential to produce more polarized, and therefore more reactive, dinitrogen via a "push-pull" activation. 16,17,[23][24][25] However, Lewis acid-base interaction remains a difficult and underdeveloped route to the synthesis of heterobimetallic N 2 complexes.…”
End-on binding of dinitrogen to low valent metal centres is common in transition metal chemistry but remains extremely rare in f-elements chemistry. In particular, heterobimetallic end-on N2 bridged complexes of...
The activation of
dinitrogen by coordination to transition metal
ions is a widely used and promising approach to the utilization of
Earth’s most abundant nitrogen source for chemical synthesis.
End-on bridging N2 complexes (μ-η1:η1-N2) are key species in nitrogen fixation chemistry, but a lack
of consensus on the seemingly simple task of assigning a Lewis structure
for such complexes has prevented application of valence electron counting
and other tools for understanding and predicting reactivity trends.
The Lewis structures of bridging N2 complexes have traditionally
been determined by comparing the experimentally observed NN distance
to the bond lengths of free N2, diazene, and hydrazine.
We introduce an alternative approach here and argue that the Lewis
structure should be assigned based on the total π-bond order
in the MNNM core (number of π-bonds), which derives from the
character (bonding or antibonding) and occupancy of the delocalized
π-symmetry molecular orbitals (π-MOs) in MNNM. To illustrate
this approach, the complexes cis,cis-[(iPr4PONOP)MCl2]2(μ-N2) (M = W,
Re, and Os) are examined in detail. Each complex is shown to have
a different number of nitrogen–nitrogen and metal–nitrogen
π-bonds, indicated as, respectively: WN–NW,
ReNNRe, and Os–NN–Os.
It follows that each of these Lewis structures represents a distinct
class of complexes (diazanyl, diazenyl, and dinitrogen, respectively),
in which the μ-N2 ligand has a different electron
donor number (total of 8e–, 6e–, or 4e–, respectively). We show how this classification
can greatly aid in understanding and predicting the properties and
reactivity patterns of μ-N2 complexes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.