Synthesen und Kristallstrukturen von neuen Alkalimetall‐Selten‐Erd‐Telluriden der Zusammensetzungen KLnTe2 (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Gd), RbLnTe2 (Ln = Ce, Nd) und CsLnTe2 (Ln = Nd)
Abstract:Von den Verbindungen der Zusammensetzung ALnQ2 (A = Na, K, Rb, Cs; Ln = Selten‐Erd‐Metall; Q = S, Se, Te) konnten die Kristallstrukturen der neuen Telluride KLaTe2, KPrTe2, KNdTe2, KGdTe2, RbCeTe2, RbNdTe2 und CsNdTe2 durch Einkristallröntgenstrukturanalysen bestimmt werden. Sie kristallisieren allesamt im α‐NaFeO2‐Typ mit der Raumgruppe R3¯m und drei Formeleinheiten in der Elementarzelle. Die Gitterparameter lauten: KLaTe2: a = 466, 63(3) pm, c = 2441, 1(3) pm; KPrTe2: a = 459, 73(2) pm, c = 2439, 8(1) pm; KN… Show more
“…The major A/RE/Q structure types have been shown in Figure , which has nicely displayed a correlation between the structure and the A/RE atomic ratio. As discussed briefly in the Introduction, as the A/RE atomic ratio increases from 0.14 (Cs[Lu 7 Q 11 ]) to 1 (AREQ 2 type − ), the structure varies from a closed cavity structure to an open channel structure and then to a 2D layered structure. Such a trend goes roughly monotonically with the density decrease (identity of atom should be taken into account).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ternary alkali metal/rare earth metal/chalcogenide compounds (A/RE/Q, Q = S, Se, Te) are fascinating for their complexity and beauty. Up until now, eight types of structures are known and are listed according to their A/RE/Q stoichiometries as following, 1:1:2 (including about 40 compounds, e.g., RbLaSe 2 ), − 3:7:12 (adopted by roughly 10 compounds, e.g., Rb 3 Yb 7 Se 12 ), − 1:3:5 (only 2 examples of CsEr 3 Se 5 and CsHo 3 Te 5 ), 3:11:18 (only found in Cs 3 Tm 11 Te 18 ), 1:5:8 (RbSc 5 Te 8 ), 2:24:36 (as found in a Tm fractional occupied example, K 2 Tm 23.33 S 36 ), 1:1:4 (including 12 compounds, e.g., KCeSe 4 ), − and 1:3:8 (including 4 compounds, e.g., KPr 3 Te 8 ). ,, Note that 1:1:4 and 1:3:8 types of compounds possess Q–Q bonding interactions and are thus excluded from the structure discussion below. Another exception is K 2 Tm 23.33 S 33 in which two types of building units are found as TmS 6 and TmS 7 .…”
Two types of novel ordered chalcogenids Cs[Lu 7 Q 11 ] (Q = S, Se) and (ClCs 6 )[RE 21 Q 34 ] (RE = Dy, Ho; Q = S, Se, Te) were discovered by high-temperature solid state reactions. The structures were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction data. Cs[Lu 7 Q 11 ] crystallize in the orthorhombic Cmca (no. 64) with a = 15.228(4)−15.849(7) Å, b = 13.357(3)−13.858(6) Å, c = 18.777(5)−19.509(8) Å, and Z = 8. (ClCs 6 )[RE 21 Q 34 ] crystallize in the monoclinic C2/m (no. 12) with a = 17.127(2)−18.868(2) Å, b = 19.489(2)− 21.578(9) Å, c = 12.988(9)−14.356(2) Å, β = 128.604(2)−128.738( 4)°, and Z = 2. Both types of compounds feature 3D RE−Q network structures that embed with dual tricapped cubes Cs 2 @Se 18 in the former or unprecedented matryoshka nesting doll structure cavities of (ClCs 6 )@Se 32 in the latter. The band gap, band structure, as well as a structure change trend of the majority of A/RE/Q compounds are presented.
“…The major A/RE/Q structure types have been shown in Figure , which has nicely displayed a correlation between the structure and the A/RE atomic ratio. As discussed briefly in the Introduction, as the A/RE atomic ratio increases from 0.14 (Cs[Lu 7 Q 11 ]) to 1 (AREQ 2 type − ), the structure varies from a closed cavity structure to an open channel structure and then to a 2D layered structure. Such a trend goes roughly monotonically with the density decrease (identity of atom should be taken into account).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ternary alkali metal/rare earth metal/chalcogenide compounds (A/RE/Q, Q = S, Se, Te) are fascinating for their complexity and beauty. Up until now, eight types of structures are known and are listed according to their A/RE/Q stoichiometries as following, 1:1:2 (including about 40 compounds, e.g., RbLaSe 2 ), − 3:7:12 (adopted by roughly 10 compounds, e.g., Rb 3 Yb 7 Se 12 ), − 1:3:5 (only 2 examples of CsEr 3 Se 5 and CsHo 3 Te 5 ), 3:11:18 (only found in Cs 3 Tm 11 Te 18 ), 1:5:8 (RbSc 5 Te 8 ), 2:24:36 (as found in a Tm fractional occupied example, K 2 Tm 23.33 S 36 ), 1:1:4 (including 12 compounds, e.g., KCeSe 4 ), − and 1:3:8 (including 4 compounds, e.g., KPr 3 Te 8 ). ,, Note that 1:1:4 and 1:3:8 types of compounds possess Q–Q bonding interactions and are thus excluded from the structure discussion below. Another exception is K 2 Tm 23.33 S 33 in which two types of building units are found as TmS 6 and TmS 7 .…”
Two types of novel ordered chalcogenids Cs[Lu 7 Q 11 ] (Q = S, Se) and (ClCs 6 )[RE 21 Q 34 ] (RE = Dy, Ho; Q = S, Se, Te) were discovered by high-temperature solid state reactions. The structures were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction data. Cs[Lu 7 Q 11 ] crystallize in the orthorhombic Cmca (no. 64) with a = 15.228(4)−15.849(7) Å, b = 13.357(3)−13.858(6) Å, c = 18.777(5)−19.509(8) Å, and Z = 8. (ClCs 6 )[RE 21 Q 34 ] crystallize in the monoclinic C2/m (no. 12) with a = 17.127(2)−18.868(2) Å, b = 19.489(2)− 21.578(9) Å, c = 12.988(9)−14.356(2) Å, β = 128.604(2)−128.738( 4)°, and Z = 2. Both types of compounds feature 3D RE−Q network structures that embed with dual tricapped cubes Cs 2 @Se 18 in the former or unprecedented matryoshka nesting doll structure cavities of (ClCs 6 )@Se 32 in the latter. The band gap, band structure, as well as a structure change trend of the majority of A/RE/Q compounds are presented.
“…The cesium cations residing between the layers are 7-fold coordinated in a monocapped trigonal prism with Cs–Te bond lengths between 3.75 and 3.92 Å, which are somewhat shorter than those of 3.90–4.21 Å in CsCu 3 Sc 3 Te 6 or 3.81–4.34 Å in CsCuGd 2 Te 4 . However, the coordination number might justify these bond lengths as seen in layered CsNdTe 2 (Cs–Te = 3.78 Å; CN(Cs) = 6), CsZnNdTe 3 (Cs–Te ranged from 3.79 to 4.19 Å; CN(Cs) = 8), and CsBi 4 Te 6 (Cs–Te from 3.76 to 4.19 Å; CN(Cs) = 10) or in the three-dimensional Cs 0.73 Cu 5.27 Pr 2 Te 6 (Cs2–Te = 3.69 Å; CN(Cs) = 6) . The Cs···Cu contact at 3.84 Å is relatively short but not unusual, as similar ones at 3.79 Å have been reported in CsCu 3 Dy 2 Se 5 , for example.…”
CsCu(3)DyTe(4) was prepared by reacting copper, dysprosium, and tellurium with cesium azide at 850 °C in a fused silica ampule. This new telluride crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/m with lattice dimensions of a = 16.462(4) Å, b = 4.434(1) Å, c = 8. 881(2) Å, β = 108.609(12)° with Z = 2. Its crystal structure is dominated by (∞)(2){[Cu(3)DyTe(4)]}(1-) anionic layers separated by Cs(+) cations. The copper cations are disordered over three different tetrahedral sites. The [DyTe(6)](9-) polyhedra form infinite (∞)(1){[DyTe(4)](5-)} chains. Magnetism studies conducted on this semiconductor suggest complex magnetic interactions between the Dy(3+) cations with a strong deviation from Curie-type behavior at low temperatures below 40 K.
“…These Te 3 2À anions are, however, more or less isolated in the structures and no interactions amongst them or with other anionic fragments are expected. Bent Te 3 entities with Te-Te-Te angles close to 90 were described as parts of the anionic substructure in disordered polytellurides like KRE 3 Te 8 (Stö we et al, 2003;Patschke et al, 1998) and RbUSb 0.33 Te 6 (Choi & Kanatzidis, 2001), and in the modulated structures of K 1/3 Ba 2/3 AgTe 2 (Gourdon et al, 2000), LnTe 3 (Malliakas et al, 2005) and RESeTe 2 (Fokwa et al, 2002;Fokwa Tsinde & Doert, 2005), for example.…”
Crystals of the rare earth metal polytelluride LaTe1.82(1), namely, lanthanum telluride (1/1.8), have been grown by molten alkali halide flux reactions and vapour‐assisted crystallization with iodine. The two‐dimensionally incommensurately modulated crystal structure has been investigated by X‐ray diffraction experiments. In contrast to the tetragonal average structure with unit‐cell dimensions of a = 4.4996 (5) and c = 9.179 (1) Å at 296 (1) K, which was solved and refined in the space group P4/nmm (No. 129), the satellite reflections are not compatible with a tetragonal symmetry but enforce a symmetry reduction. Possible space groups have been derived by group–subgroup relationships and by consideration of previous reports on similar rare earth metal polychalcogenide structures. Two structural models in the orthorhombic superspace group, i.e.Pmmn(α,β,)000(−α,β,)000 (No. 59.2.51.39) and Pm21n(α,β,)000(−α,β,)000 (No. 31.2.51.35), with modulation wave vectors q1 = αa* + βb* + c* and q2 = −αa* + βb* + c* [α = 0.272 (1) and β = 0.314 (1)], have been established and evaluated against each other. The modulation describes the distribution of defects in the planar [Te] layer, coupled to a displacive modulation due to the formation of different Te anions. The bonding situation in the planar [Te] layer and the different Te anion species have been investigated by density functional theory (DFT) methods and an electron localizability indicator (ELI‐D)‐based bonding analysis on three different approximants. The temperature‐dependent electrical resistance revealed a semiconducting behaviour with an estimated band gap of 0.17 eV.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.