Syntactic annotation in the Reference Corpus for the Processing of Basque (EPEC): Theoretical and practical issues

Aldezabal, Izaskun; Aranzabe, Maxux; Arriola, Jose Mari; Ilarraza, Arantza Díaz de

doi:10.1515/cllt.2009.010

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, an annotated text corpus is generated by way of attaching various tags of intralinguistic and extralinguistic information with the text samples (Leech, 2005;Berez & Gries, 2010). After annotation, a text corpus changes to a large extent in its character, content, form, and function (Aldebazal et al, 2009). The tags that are tagged to the texts usually increase the utility of a text corpus by way of providing specificity in text identification and accuracy in information extraction (O'Donnell, 1999).…”

Section: What Is Corpus Annotation?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Proposing a Customised Method for Extratextual Documentative Annotation on Written Text Corpus

Dash¹,

Elumalai²,

Alqahtani³

et al. 2019

IJEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we have made an attempt to portray a perceivable sketch of extratextual documentative annotation which, in the present frame of text annotation, is considered as one of the indispensable processes through which we can add representational information to the texts included in a written corpus. This becomes more important when a corpus is made with a large number of texts obtained from different genres and text types. To develop a workable frame for extratextual annotation, at each stage, we have broadly classified the existing processes of corpus annotation into two broad types. Moreover, we have tried to explain different layers that are embedded with extratextual annotation of texts as well as marked out the applications which can substantially enhance the accessibility of language data from a corpus for the works of text file management, information retrieval, lexical items extraction, and language processing. The techniques that we have proposed and described in this paper are unique in the sense that these are highly useful for expanding the utility of data of a written text corpus beyond the immediate horizons of language processing to the realms of theoretical, descriptive, and applied linguistics. In this paper, we have also argued that we should try to annotate all kinds of written text corpora so far developed in different natural languages at the extratextual level in a uniform manner so that the text samples stored in corpora can be uniformly used for various works of descriptive linguistics, theoretical linguistics, language technology, and applied linguistics including grammar writing, dictionary compilation, and language teaching. The annotation scheme proposed here is applied on a sample Bangla text corpus and we have noted that the accessibility of data and information from this kind of corpus is far easier than that of an un-annotated raw corpus.

show abstract

Section: What Is Corpus Annotation?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Proposing a Customised Method for Extratextual Documentative Annotation on Written Text Corpus

Dash¹,

Elumalai²,

Alqahtani³

et al. 2019

IJEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With the growth of Unicode, however, the need for the SAMPA character set is obviated, although major corpora/resources like CELEX still use it. 2 Phonemic annotation is possible to generate automatically from orthographic transcription via a pronunciation lexicon and/or rule-based algorithms. Fine phonetic transcription, on the other hand, makes use of an extended set of characters including diacritics, and usually requires hand-coding by humans.…”

Section: Phonetic and Phonological Annotationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…10 for the Reference Corpus for the Processing of Basque (EPEC; cf. [2]), a 300 K word corpus of written Basque annotated morphologically (for part-of-speech, number, definiteness, and case), lexically (for named entities, multi-word units), and syntactically in a Dependency-Grammar format.…”

Section: Parsed Corpora (Inline/embedded)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Linguistic Annotation in/for Corpus Linguistics

Gries

Berez

2017

Handbook of Linguistic Annotation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article surveys linguistic annotation in corpora and corpus linguistics. We first define the concept of 'corpus' as a radial category and then, in Sect. 2, discuss a variety of kinds of information for which corpora are annotated and that are exploited in contemporary corpus linguistics. Section 3 then exemplifies many current formats of annotation with an eye to highlighting both the diversity of formats currently available and the emergence of XML annotation as, for now, the most widespread form of annotation. Section 4 summarizes and concludes with desiderata for future developments.

show abstract

“…Lehen bertsio horrekin, CoNLL 2007 Multilingual Dependency Parsing lehiaketan, beste 9 hizkuntzarekin batera, eta 20 sistemaren artean ebaluatu zuten. 2010ean, dependentzia-ereduan etiketatuta dagoen euskarazko EPEC-DEP zuhaitzbankua [4] CoNLL-X formatura egokitu zen, dependentzietan oinarritutako analizatzaile sintaktiko-sortzaileek erabili ahal izateko. CoNLL-X formatura moldatu ondoren, 150.000 hitz eta 11.225 esaldikoa den euskarazko z uhaitzbankua lortu zen (hemendik aurrera EZB II zuhaitz-bankua izenaz ezagutuko dena).…”

Section: Euskararako Analizatzaile Sintaktiko-estatistikoa Hobetzeko unclassified

Euskararako analizatzaile sintaktiko estatistikoa hobetzeko teknikak

Bengoetxea

Gojenola²

2016

EKAIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Laburpena: honetan euskararako analizatzaile sintaktiko-estatistikoen emaitzak hobetzeko helburuarekin egindako esperimentu-multzoa aurkezten da. Lan honetan teknika ez-berdinak aztertzen dira: i) zuhaitz-transformazioak, ii) analizatzaileen pilaketa, eta iii) analizatzaile-modelo desberdinen irteeren konbinazioa. Emaitza guztiak zuhaitzbankutik zuzenean hartutako urre-patroiko ezaugarri morfosintaktikoak erabiliz eta analisi morfologiko eta desanbiguatze-moduluetatik hartutako ezaugarri morfosintaktiko automatikoak erabiliz egin dira.Hitz gakoak: Dependentzietan oinarritutako analisia, Analisi morfologikoa eta desanbiguazioa, Analizatzaile sintaktikoen konbinazioa.Abstract: This paper presents a set of experiments to improve the results of the statistical syntactic analyzers for Basque. The present work has examined different techniques: i) tree transformations, ii) stacking, and iii) combinations of the output of several parsers. All the results have been obtained using gold morphosyntactic tags coming directly from the treebank and using automatic mophosyntactic tags coming from morphological analysis and disambiguation module.

show abstract

Syntactic annotation in the Reference Corpus for the Processing of Basque (EPEC): Theoretical and practical issues

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Proposing a Customised Method for Extratextual Documentative Annotation on Written Text Corpus

Proposing a Customised Method for Extratextual Documentative Annotation on Written Text Corpus

Linguistic Annotation in/for Corpus Linguistics

Euskararako analizatzaile sintaktiko estatistikoa hobetzeko teknikak

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About