1999
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<0364:seqcot>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synorogenic extension: Quantitative constraints on the age and displacement of the Zanskar shear zone (northwest Himalaya)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
179
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
10
179
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on structural and/or geochronological evidence, extensional motion in the Higher Himalayas has been considered coeval with thrusting at lower topographic levels (Royden and Burchfi el 1987, Inger 1998, Dézes et al 1999). In the Caledonides, Harz et al (2001) proposed the same structural relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on structural and/or geochronological evidence, extensional motion in the Higher Himalayas has been considered coeval with thrusting at lower topographic levels (Royden and Burchfi el 1987, Inger 1998, Dézes et al 1999). In the Caledonides, Harz et al (2001) proposed the same structural relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This migmatitic core is symmetrically surrounded by rocks of the sillimanite, kyanite ± staurolite, garnet, biotite, and chlorite mineral zones. The structural and metamorphic data from the Miyar-Gianbul Valley section reveal that the tectono-metamorphic evolution of the HHCZ in SE Zanskar is associated with a polyphase tectonic history involving converging nappe structures superimposed by opposite-directed extensional structures (Dèzes et al 1999, Steck et al1999, Robyr et al 2002. The first tectonic event corresponds to an early phase of crustal thickening related to NE-directed movements.…”
Section: High-grade Metamorphic Rocks Of the High Himalayanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time, the regime of N-S extension was dominant. When the India-Asia convergence speeded up, the Himalaya experienced a rapid deformation, resulting in Figure 8 Statistical diagram of the U-Pb/U-(Th)-Pb ages of leucogranites and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages of leucogranites and metasedimentary rocks in Himalayan orogen (data from [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][15][16][17][18][22][23][24]30,). the thrusting and shorting.…”
Section: Geodynamic Implications On the Transformation Of Tectonic Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confirms the view that NSTR is probably the result of N-S contraction [29] and provides unequivocal evidence for the transformation of tectonic regime. In order to accurately constrain the time of the transformation of tectonic regime from N-S extension to N-S contraction, we summarize and analyze the ages of STDS and NSTRs in Gyirong and other areas in Himalayan orogen ( Figure 7) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][12][13][14][15][16][17]22,28,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. The result shows that the STDS was active from ca.…”
Section: Middle-miocene Transformation Of Tectonic Regime In Himalayamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation