Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2008
DOI: 10.1029/2007wr006065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synoptic assessment of water resource variability in reservoirs by remote sensing: General approach and application to the runoff harvesting systems of south India

Abstract: [1] This paper presents a methodological procedure based on remote sensing and image analysis techniques designed to map and quantify water stocks in small irrigation reservoirs over vast, user-defined regions. Because the method is based on unsupervised pixel classification schemes, it is analytically transparent and entirely replicable and can therefore be used in most settings as a tool for integrated water resource management, planning, or policy making, with benefits to irrigation, land use, agriculture, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, there is a lack of empirical studies that quantify tank hydrologic fluxes, especially at the scale of watersheds comprising of multiple tanks (Glendenning et al, 2012;Mialhe et al, 2008;Pandey et al, 2011Pandey et al, , 2013. One reason for the lack of information is that both groundwater recharge and ET are highly spatially variable, and thus difficult to accurately measure at the field scale (Glendenning et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there is a lack of empirical studies that quantify tank hydrologic fluxes, especially at the scale of watersheds comprising of multiple tanks (Glendenning et al, 2012;Mialhe et al, 2008;Pandey et al, 2011Pandey et al, , 2013. One reason for the lack of information is that both groundwater recharge and ET are highly spatially variable, and thus difficult to accurately measure at the field scale (Glendenning et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Envisat ASAR (Cband radar) and Landsat TM/ETM+ data (multispectral imagery) now provide images at spatial resolutions of 30 m and 15 m, respectively (Gardini et al, 1995). In India, the storage volumes of small-sized reservoirs were estimated with Landsat images (Mialhe et al, 2008). Envisat advanced synthetic aperture radar (ASAR) was used to obtain the surface areas of reservoirs (Liebe et al, 2009).…”
Section: Surface Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RS technique enables changes in the reservoir to be monitored since the images provide synoptic, repetitive and timely information across the whole area of the reservoir (Mialhe et al, 2008). Furthermore, free availability of images from the Landsat program, especially with the new improvements incorporated in the Operational Land Imager (OLI) sensor onboard Landsat-8, which has the potential to monitor changes in the Earth's land cover and take measurements of terrestrial surface waters remotely (Alsdorf et al, 2007;Roy et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%