2010
DOI: 10.1038/nrg2899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias

Abstract: Despite their name, synonymous mutations have significant consequences for cellular processes in all taxa. As a result, an understanding of codon bias is central to fields as diverse as molecular evolution and biotechnology. Although recent advances in sequencing and synthetic biology have helped resolve longstanding questions about codon bias, they have also uncovered striking patterns that suggest new hypotheses about protein synthesis. Ongoing work to quantify the dynamics of initiation and elongation is as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

39
1,349
2
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,364 publications
(1,436 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
39
1,349
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a negative correlation between CBI and ENC ( R 2  = .985), G + Cc ( R 2  = .857) and G + C3s ( R 2  = .909), whereas a positive correlation was found between ENC and G + Cc ( R 2  = .85) and G + C3s ( R 2  = .896) (Figure 2). Results were consistent with the neutral mutational theories, in which the G + C content of mt genome was reported to be the most significant factor in determining codon bias among organisms (Chen, Lee, Hottes, Shapiro, & McAdams, 2004; Plotkin & Kudla, 2011). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We found a negative correlation between CBI and ENC ( R 2  = .985), G + Cc ( R 2  = .857) and G + C3s ( R 2  = .909), whereas a positive correlation was found between ENC and G + Cc ( R 2  = .85) and G + C3s ( R 2  = .896) (Figure 2). Results were consistent with the neutral mutational theories, in which the G + C content of mt genome was reported to be the most significant factor in determining codon bias among organisms (Chen, Lee, Hottes, Shapiro, & McAdams, 2004; Plotkin & Kudla, 2011). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…All rights reserved 4 be specific for individual host production systems (Chamary et al 2006;Gustafsson et al 2004;Plotkin & Kudla 2011).…”
Section: Acc E P Ted P R E P R I Ntmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In heterologous protein expression, the gene of interest can be over-expressed and can account for up to 30% of the total protein within the cell (Plotkin & Kudla 2011). This may place strain on the cell and hence, the principles of codon bias for heterologous protein expression may differ substantially from those for endogenous expression.…”
Section: Acc E P Ted P R E P R I Ntmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations indicate that, although global codon bias may be affected by tRNA availability (6,(42)(43)(44), codon choice at a given position may be defined by at least three parameters: (i) amino acid sequence; (ii) mRNA structure near the start codon and RBS; and (iii) RBS-mediated pausing. In some cases, a subset of these parameters may not be under selection, resulting in an evolved sequence that converges for only a subset of the metrics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is tempting to approximate synonymous codons as equivalent (2), most prokaryotes and many eukaryotes (3, 4) display a strong preference for certain codons over synonymous alternatives (5,6). Although different species have evolved to prefer different codons, codon bias is largely consistent within each species (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%