2018
DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2018.1511533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Synonymization’ threat and the implications for the funding of school districts with relatively high populations of black students

Abstract: Education stakeholders have used descriptors of poverty and race as if they were synonymous. This 'synonymization' of identities is particularly evident for black and poor students. We define 'synonymization' as a policy threat that emerges when policymakers conflate two marginalized identities, resulting in policies that ostensibly, but not actually, address biased structures. From this construct, we posit two claims: (1) largely poor districts are not largely black districts and (2) dollars appropriated to l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these findings may not demonstrate the uniqueness of Black women principals’ leadership contexts compared with other groups of principals (e.g., Black men, White women), it may reveal the contextual challenges and barriers that Black women principals face when exerting leadership (Bloom & Erlandson, 2003; Lomotey, 2019; Moorosi et al, 2018). The school finance literature (e.g., Alexander and Jang, 2019; Jimenez-Castellanos and Topper, 2012) has suggested that leaders in organizations with higher proportions of disadvantaged students face additional challenges relating to low resources. More specifically, Alexander and Jang (2019) found no statistically significant association between total and instructional expenditure per pupil and the proportion of Black students, but did find a significant and positive association between expenditure per pupil and the proportion of FRL-eligible students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although these findings may not demonstrate the uniqueness of Black women principals’ leadership contexts compared with other groups of principals (e.g., Black men, White women), it may reveal the contextual challenges and barriers that Black women principals face when exerting leadership (Bloom & Erlandson, 2003; Lomotey, 2019; Moorosi et al, 2018). The school finance literature (e.g., Alexander and Jang, 2019; Jimenez-Castellanos and Topper, 2012) has suggested that leaders in organizations with higher proportions of disadvantaged students face additional challenges relating to low resources. More specifically, Alexander and Jang (2019) found no statistically significant association between total and instructional expenditure per pupil and the proportion of Black students, but did find a significant and positive association between expenditure per pupil and the proportion of FRL-eligible students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The school finance literature (e.g., Alexander and Jang, 2019; Jimenez-Castellanos and Topper, 2012) has suggested that leaders in organizations with higher proportions of disadvantaged students face additional challenges relating to low resources. More specifically, Alexander and Jang (2019) found no statistically significant association between total and instructional expenditure per pupil and the proportion of Black students, but did find a significant and positive association between expenditure per pupil and the proportion of FRL-eligible students. As the authors further argued, “focusing only on poverty as a mantle by which to address all minoritized identities may result in policy strategies that do not address the essence of the problem faced by groups marginalized by other labels [such as Black]” (p. 154).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most prior literature on disparities in school funding has focused either on economic status alone or on race, presuming substantial overlap between the two. Others have noted the 'Synonymization' threat of assuming poverty-driven funding to fully accommodate racial disparities (Alexander & Jang, 2019). Baker (2008) elaborates on this point by showing statistically, that racial composition itself, above and beyond other economic conditions, affects the costs of achieving common outcome goals.…”
Section: Background and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those attending suburban schools typically have relatively higher SES and are more homogenous, with the majority of students being White (Milner, 2006). Urban and rural schools tend to have more students of color and more poor students (Alexander & Jang, 2018a). Among students of color, Black students attending urban and rural schools tend to have lower SES than Black students attending suburban schools (Hill, 2009).…”
Section: Urbanicity and Racial/ethnic Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have argued that such institutionalized racism, which includes racial inequalities in schooling experiences and outcomes, has resulted in students of color confronting more social and educational risks. CRT scholars have also argued that structural racism and other forms of oppression based on diverse marginalized social constructs (e.g., SES) intersect the experiences of people of color (Alexander & Jang, 2018a;Collins & Bilge, 2016;Crenshaw, 1991;Hancock, 2007;McCall, 2005;Yuval-Davis, 2006). The emphasis of CRT on the intersecting forms of oppression is central to understanding the simultaneous associations of race, ethnicity, and SES in the contextualized racial/ethnic matching effects of schools' urbanicity.…”
Section: Critical Race Theory and Critical Urban Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%