The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta07976c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergizing the internal electric field and ferroelectric polarization of the BiFeO3/ZnIn2S4 Z-scheme heterojunction for photocatalytic overall water splitting

Abstract: Coupling internal electric field and ferroelectric polarization through the modulation of surface electronic structures to achieve high carrier separation and migration efficiency is attractive, but challenging in solar-to-chemical energy conversion....

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27,28 For example, a few heterojunctions based on BiFeO 3 , such as BiFeO 3 @TiO 2 , 29 BiFeO 3 /BiVO 4 , 22 and BiFeO 3 /ZnIn 2 S 4 (ref. 30), have been demonstrated for various photocatalytic systems. However, research on boosting spatial charge separation induced by single-domain ferroelectric heterojunction photocatalysts, which incorporate polarization electric fields and a built-in-electric field at the heterojunction interface, both of which act as dual driving forces (DDFs) following a Z-scheme charge transfer mode, is lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 For example, a few heterojunctions based on BiFeO 3 , such as BiFeO 3 @TiO 2 , 29 BiFeO 3 /BiVO 4 , 22 and BiFeO 3 /ZnIn 2 S 4 (ref. 30), have been demonstrated for various photocatalytic systems. However, research on boosting spatial charge separation induced by single-domain ferroelectric heterojunction photocatalysts, which incorporate polarization electric fields and a built-in-electric field at the heterojunction interface, both of which act as dual driving forces (DDFs) following a Z-scheme charge transfer mode, is lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metallic sulfide semiconductors (e.g., CdS, CdIn 2 S 4, and In 2 S 3 ) have garnered significant attention as ultrathin materials due to their adjustable electronic and photoelectric properties. ZnIn 2 S 4 , as a typical visible response ternary sulfide semiconductor with a suitable band gap and a compact interface, has been widely considered and explored. , The ultrathin ZnIn 2 S 4 nanosheet structure can improve the performance to a certain extent, but the photocatalytic activity is not yet sufficient to meet the requirements of a wider range of applications . The main reason for the low photocatalytic efficiency is that the photoelectron–hole pairs in the excited state are unstable and easy to recombine .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the performance of pure BFO in oxygen evolution is limited by the small number of surface-active sites and poor photoelectric conversion efficiency . To address these issues, several approaches such as surface modifications, heteroatom doping, morphological design, and engineering defects have been employed to improve photocatalytic performance by increasing the photoelectric conversion efficiency and surface-active sites. , The construction of heterojunction with other semiconductors such as AuAg/BiFeO 3 , Ag@BiPO 4 /BiOBr/BiFeO 3 , graphene oxide/BiFeO 3 , BiFeO 3 /ZnFe 2 O 4 , BiVO 4 –BiFeO 3 , g-C 3 N 4 /BiFeO 3 , WO 3 /BiFeO 3 , BiFeO 3 /Znln 2 S 4 and BiFeO 3 @COF have been reported, however, the photocatalytic response still needs to be improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%