2016
DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.12512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergistic targeted inhibition of MEK and dual PI3K/mTOR diminishes viability and inhibits tumor growth of canine melanoma underscoring its utility as a preclinical model for human mucosal melanoma

Abstract: SummaryHuman mucosal melanoma (MM), an uncommon, aggressive and diverse subtype, shares characteristics with spontaneous MM in dogs. Although BRAF and N‐RAS mutations are uncommon in MM in both species, the majority of human and canine MM evaluated exhibited RAS/ERK and/or PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway activation. Canine MM cell lines, with varying ERK and AKT/mTOR activation levels reflective of naturally occurring differences in dogs, were sensitive to the MEK inhibitor GSK1120212 and dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was observed in both NF1 null and NF1 heterozygous cell lines, implying that they have potential therapeutic roles in NF1 ‐related nerve sheath tumours and sporadic MPNSTs, respectively, as well as SDMs. Similar synergistic inhibition with MEK inhibitors and mTORC1/2 inhibitors has been observed in models of canine melanoma cell lines . Currently, there are at least two phase Ib/II clinical trials aimed to test this combination of MEK + PI3K/mTOR inhibitors (NVP‐BEZ235 + MEK162) in a variety of resistant solid tumours (NCT#01337765 and NCT#01343498); the results of these studies have not been published.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This was observed in both NF1 null and NF1 heterozygous cell lines, implying that they have potential therapeutic roles in NF1 ‐related nerve sheath tumours and sporadic MPNSTs, respectively, as well as SDMs. Similar synergistic inhibition with MEK inhibitors and mTORC1/2 inhibitors has been observed in models of canine melanoma cell lines . Currently, there are at least two phase Ib/II clinical trials aimed to test this combination of MEK + PI3K/mTOR inhibitors (NVP‐BEZ235 + MEK162) in a variety of resistant solid tumours (NCT#01337765 and NCT#01343498); the results of these studies have not been published.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The phosphorylation of AKT can decrease this negative regulation, thus verifying that AKT aids in suppressing the negative regulatory factors of mTOR (25). However, more than one signaling pathway (other than PI3K/AKT) is responsible for the regulation of mTOR (26). Hunger and stress responses can result in the dephosphorylation of the autophagy-related protein Beclin-1, which inactivates mTOR and induces autophagy (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, more than one signaling pathway (other than PI3K/AKT) is responsible for the regulation of mTOR (26). Hunger and stress responses can result in the dephosphorylation of the autophagy-related protein Beclin-1, which inactivates mTOR and induces autophagy (26). AKT can promote the activation of mTOR as an upstream effector molecule of mTORC1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations provide rational for a dual inhibitory strategy targeting both two signalings. Some preclinical studies have already shown that a combination of mTOR inhibitors with inhibitors targeting MEK or Raf leds to an enhanced response (49)(50)(51)(52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%