2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergistic stabilizing lithium sulfur battery via nanocoating polypyrrole on cobalt sulfide nanobox

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 15 ] However, metal sulfides generally have poor electrical conductivity and high gravimetric density. To address these issues, recently nanostructural metal sulfides combined with carbon materials such as ultrathin TiS 2 nanosheets layered with N, S codoped carbon, [ 35 ] interlaced carbon nanotubes threaded hollow Co 3 S 4 nanoboxes, [ 36 ] polypyrrole on CoS nanoboxes, [ 37 ] and CoS 2 nanoparticles embedded in porous carbon [ 38 ] have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15 ] However, metal sulfides generally have poor electrical conductivity and high gravimetric density. To address these issues, recently nanostructural metal sulfides combined with carbon materials such as ultrathin TiS 2 nanosheets layered with N, S codoped carbon, [ 35 ] interlaced carbon nanotubes threaded hollow Co 3 S 4 nanoboxes, [ 36 ] polypyrrole on CoS nanoboxes, [ 37 ] and CoS 2 nanoparticles embedded in porous carbon [ 38 ] have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, soluble and polar lithium polysulfides can lose their electrical contact with nonpolar carbon materials and dissolve into the electrolyte after a long work time as a consequence of weak polar-nonpolar effects, leading to poor Coulombic efficiency, low utilization of S and slow redox kinetics [40,41]. Thus, polar host materials, such as transition metal oxides and sulfides, are employed to improve the adsorption of lithium polysulfides by enhancing the chemical binding [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. Unfortunately, unsatisfied electrical conductivity of most metal oxides and sulfides is detrimental to the kinetics of sulfur electrochemical conversion, leading to poor cycling performance and low sulfur utilization, as well as poor rate capability [50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of S, the peak with binding energy of 162.4 eV is related to Co−S bond (Figure 3e) [35] . Two peaks at 163.3 and 164.2 eV can be assigned to C−S 2p 3/2 and C−S 2p 1/2 , [36] while the other two peaks with binding energy of 168.8 and 169.9 eV are ascribed to S−O 2p 3/2 and S−O 2p 1/2 [37] . Nitrogen adsorption‐desorption isotherm measurement is performed to probe pore structure and specific surface area of Si@C−Co 9 S 8 /C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[35] Two peaks at 163.3 and 164.2 eV can be assigned to CÀ S 2p 3/2 and CÀ S 2p 1/ 2 , [36] while the other two peaks with binding energy of 168.8 and 169.9 eV are ascribed to SÀ O 2p 3/2 and SÀ O 2p 1/2 . [37] Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm measurement is performed to probe pore structure and specific surface area of Si@CÀ Co 9 S 8 /C. As illustrated in Figure 3f, Si@CÀ Co 9 S 8 /C displays a typical type IV adsorption-desorption isotherm with an H3type hysteresis loop, suggesting the presence of mesopores in Si@CÀ Co 9 S 8 /C.…”
Section: Morphology and Structure Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%