2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.02.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergistic effects of holding time at intercritical annealing temperature and initial microstructure on the mechanical properties of dual phase steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a decrease in hardness with the increasing holding time is related to a decrease in the amount of martensite. Conversely, as shown in Figure , for the IA samples, hardness increases during holding at the IA temperature due to partial austenitization (formation of austenite from pearlite and then from the surrounding ferrite phase), and the resulting increase in the martensite fraction after quenching can be deduced by comparing Figure h,i. The hardness reaches the same plateau at ≈5 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, a decrease in hardness with the increasing holding time is related to a decrease in the amount of martensite. Conversely, as shown in Figure , for the IA samples, hardness increases during holding at the IA temperature due to partial austenitization (formation of austenite from pearlite and then from the surrounding ferrite phase), and the resulting increase in the martensite fraction after quenching can be deduced by comparing Figure h,i. The hardness reaches the same plateau at ≈5 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Tensile testing was carried out at room temperature by a computerized testing machine at the constant cross‐head speed of 1 mm min −1 to obtain engineering stress ( S )–engineering strain ( e ) curves. The values of work‐hardening rate were determined based on dσ/dε|i={σi+1σi1}/{εi+1εi1}, where σ=S(1+e) and ε=ln(1+e) are true stress and true strain (logarithmic strain), respectively. The instantaneous (incremental) work‐hardening exponent ( n ) based on the Hollomon equation (σ=kεn or lnσ=lnk+nlnε) was also considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneities of the materials at various scales have received much attention due to the potential of attaining impressive mechanical properties. The relevant heterogeneities include the gradient structure [4], bimodal structure [5], dual-phase (DP) steel [6][7][8], heterogeneous lamella structure [9] and nanodomained structure [10]. These materials all have a dramatic difference in strength between different domains, while the sizes and geometry of the domains could be in the range of micrometers to millimeters, and have been defined as heterogeneous structural materials (HSMs) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%