2020
DOI: 10.1111/liv.14585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergistic effects of extracellular vesicle phenotyping and AFP in hepatobiliary cancer differentiation

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, analysis of the protein cargo on or in sEVs could potentially allow the detection of resistant tumor parts during treatment early on [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Indeed, methods like antibody arrays [ 21 ], fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) surface profiling [ 22 ], and proteomic profiling via mass spectrometry (MS) [ 23 ] have already been employed for the analysis of NSCLC-derived sEVs. However, some of these analyses are not easily transferred into clinical applicable methods as they require specialized equipment and trained personnel or are time-consuming and expensive [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, analysis of the protein cargo on or in sEVs could potentially allow the detection of resistant tumor parts during treatment early on [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Indeed, methods like antibody arrays [ 21 ], fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) surface profiling [ 22 ], and proteomic profiling via mass spectrometry (MS) [ 23 ] have already been employed for the analysis of NSCLC-derived sEVs. However, some of these analyses are not easily transferred into clinical applicable methods as they require specialized equipment and trained personnel or are time-consuming and expensive [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike conventional tissue biopsy, liquid biopsy is a non-invasive approach, which allows repeated analysis to enable monitoring tumor progression, metastasis, and recurrence, as well as treatment response. This enables identification and accounting novel biomarker candidates circulating in the bloodstream with sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values reaching up to 100% [ 36 ].…”
Section: Proteomic Profiling Technologies and Big Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EVs collected from saliva may be useful for the diagnosis of lung cancer [ 192 , 193 , 194 ]. It has been reported that the contents of EVs collected from serum, such as miR-200, lipocalin-2 [ 86 ], miR-505-5p [ 91 ], ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCHL1) [ 88 ], cell-free DNA [ 82 , 83 ], and proteins [ 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 ], are useful for the diagnosis of lung cancer. MiR-193a-5p, and miR-551b-5p have been suggested as biomarkers of malignant pleural mesothelioma.…”
Section: Potential Of Evs For Liquid Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%