Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergistic effect of steam and lactic acid against Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Listeria monocytogenes biofilms on polyvinyl chloride and stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Gram-positive bacteria (such as Listeria ) the peptidoglycan layer is thick compared with Gram-negative bacteria, this differential thickness in peptidoglycan may contribute to differences in PUV-mediated inactivation, as proposed previously [51]. Moreover, a thick peptidoglycan layer consists of more sugars and amino acids and secreted residues, potentially aiding the formation of a firmer biofilm [50, 52]. However, no definite mechanistic explanation has been proposed to date for why PUV-treatment was less effective on biofilms formed by L. monocytogenes than E. coli O157:H7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Gram-positive bacteria (such as Listeria ) the peptidoglycan layer is thick compared with Gram-negative bacteria, this differential thickness in peptidoglycan may contribute to differences in PUV-mediated inactivation, as proposed previously [51]. Moreover, a thick peptidoglycan layer consists of more sugars and amino acids and secreted residues, potentially aiding the formation of a firmer biofilm [50, 52]. However, no definite mechanistic explanation has been proposed to date for why PUV-treatment was less effective on biofilms formed by L. monocytogenes than E. coli O157:H7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, it is evident in the literature that the relative interaction between antimicrobials with bacterial cells (either in planktonic or sessile form) is complex [35] and depends on several factors, including the antimicrobial used [4345], surface type [46], and the bacterial strain [4749]. It has also been reported that the robustness of biofilms formed by Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria may be attributed to cell wall structure, secreted compounds, and growth factors [50]. In Gram-positive bacteria (such as Listeria ) the peptidoglycan layer is thick compared with Gram-negative bacteria, this differential thickness in peptidoglycan may contribute to differences in PUV-mediated inactivation, as proposed previously [51].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KH1 bacteriophage reduces the population of O157:H7 cells attached to stainless steel, but not those incased within a biofilm matrix (Sharma et al, 2005). The effect of combined techniques such as steam and lactic acid (Ban et al, 2012), aerosolized sanitizers (Park et al, 2012), UV and dry heat (Bae and Lee, 2012) were also studied and have the potential to control STEC O157:H7 biofilms found on surfaces present in the food industry. The best approach for controlling STEC biofilm should kill E. coli O157:H7 within the biofilm and remove the biofilm matrix from the contaminated surface.…”
Section: Can Stec Biofilms Be Removed?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best approach for controlling STEC biofilm should kill E. coli O157:H7 within the biofilm and remove the biofilm matrix from the contaminated surface. For example, a combination of steam and lactic acid were able to kill E. coli O157:H7 and remove the biofilm matrix from stainless steel surfaces (Ban et al, 2012). Further studies should investigate the effect of antibiofilm molecules on the dispersal of biofilms and also focus on mixed biofilms containing both non-pathogenic and STEC bacteria.…”
Section: Can Stec Biofilms Be Removed?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathogens that are attached to food and food contact surfaces or form biofilms can serve as the potential source of contamination of foods, a real threat to the food processing industry (Joseph, Otta, & Karunasagar, ; Soares et al, ). Bacteria in a biofilm have a high affinity for surfaces (Ibusquiza, Herrera, Vazquez‐Sanchez, & Cabo, ; Jahid and Ha, ) and are hard to remove (Hansen & Vogel, ; Ban, Park, Kim, Ryu, & Kang, ). Moreover, the biofilm (attached) cells are more resistant to disinfectant treatments than the planktonic (suspended) cells (Eguale et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%