2019
DOI: 10.1101/807537
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergistic effect: a common theme in mixed-species litter decomposition

Abstract: 20Litter decomposition plays a key role in ecosystem nutrients cycling, yet, to date 21 science is lacking a comprehensive understanding of the non-additive effect in 22 mixing litter decomposition. 23In order to fill that gap, we compiled 69 individual studies for the purpose of 24 performing two sub-meta-analyses on the non-additive effect. 25Our results show that a significantly synergistic effect occurs at global scale with 26 the average increase by 2-4% in litter mixture decomposition; In particular, 27 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could explain the positive litter mixture effect observed in the presence of soil fauna. This result corroborates findings reported in both a meta‐analysis on the non‐additive effect in litter mixtures (Liu et al, 2020) and a field experiment in two tropical forests by Peguero et al (2019). These latter authors noticed a 22.6% increase in litter decomposition when soil fauna was included in the decomposition of litter mixtures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This could explain the positive litter mixture effect observed in the presence of soil fauna. This result corroborates findings reported in both a meta‐analysis on the non‐additive effect in litter mixtures (Liu et al, 2020) and a field experiment in two tropical forests by Peguero et al (2019). These latter authors noticed a 22.6% increase in litter decomposition when soil fauna was included in the decomposition of litter mixtures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%