2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-008-1402-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergistic action of rapid chilling and nisin on the inactivation of Escherichia coli

Abstract: International audienceThe effect of rapid and slow chilling on survival and nisin sensitivity was investigated in Escherichia coli. Membrane permeabilization induced by cold shock was assessed by uptake of the fluorescent dye 1-N-phenylnapthylamine. Slow chilling (2 degrees C min(-1)) did not induce transient susceptibility to nisin. Combining rapid chilling (2,000 degrees C min(-1)) and nisin causes a dose-dependent reduction in the population of cells in both exponential and stationary growth phases. A reduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Enterococcus and Listeria strains were susceptible to the antimicrobial activity of supernatants (24 h) but the aspect and the diameters of the halos were not related to Muller Hinton and BHI agar-media. As expected, there was no antimicrobial activity against E. coli (Table II) when the test was performed on TSB agar-medium, since Gramnegative bacteria are naturally resistant to the action of bacteriocins produced by Gram-positive bacteria due to their outer membrane (Cao-Hoang, Marechal, Le-Thanh, 2008;Gyawali, Ibrahim, 2014). However, a questionable result could have been considered if this analysis had been carried out only on MacConkey agar-medium, since apparent inhibition halos against E. coli were seen only in MacConkey and were not seen in TSB agar-medium.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Enterococcus and Listeria strains were susceptible to the antimicrobial activity of supernatants (24 h) but the aspect and the diameters of the halos were not related to Muller Hinton and BHI agar-media. As expected, there was no antimicrobial activity against E. coli (Table II) when the test was performed on TSB agar-medium, since Gramnegative bacteria are naturally resistant to the action of bacteriocins produced by Gram-positive bacteria due to their outer membrane (Cao-Hoang, Marechal, Le-Thanh, 2008;Gyawali, Ibrahim, 2014). However, a questionable result could have been considered if this analysis had been carried out only on MacConkey agar-medium, since apparent inhibition halos against E. coli were seen only in MacConkey and were not seen in TSB agar-medium.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Thus, cells in stationary phase under rapid chilling require higher concentrations of nisin (CaoHoang et al 2008). As observed with other strategies, simultaneous treatment with bacteriocins has a more significant result than the sequential use (Cao-Hoang et al 2008).…”
Section: Bacteriocins Combined With Temperature Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Differences in the effect of the target cells’ growth phase on their sensitivity to active bacteriocins or bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances have also been reported in the past [1618]. Lag and exponential phase cells seem to be less resistant than stationary phase cells as during these phases biosynthesis of the target cell membrane is more vigorous, enhancing the initial electrostatic attraction of the bacteriocin that is thought to be the driving force for subsequent events [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%