2020
DOI: 10.1002/evan.21860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergies between the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease framework and multiple branches of evolutionary anthropology

Abstract: The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) hypothesis derives from the epidemiological and basic/mechanistic health sciences. This well-supported hypothesis holds that environment during the earliest stages of life-pre-conception, pregnancy, infancy-shapes developmental trajectories and ultimately health outcomes across the lifespan. Evolutionary anthropologists from multiple subdisciplines are embracing synergies between the DOHaD framework and developmentalist approaches from evolutionary biolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(142 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 ). The increasing knowledge about the different causes of cancer also supports research on our early ancestors, for instance when cancer allows conclusions about nutritional status, working conditions, or exposure to chemical toxins [ 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ). The increasing knowledge about the different causes of cancer also supports research on our early ancestors, for instance when cancer allows conclusions about nutritional status, working conditions, or exposure to chemical toxins [ 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that early menarche is associated with numerous negative health and social outcomes, this study has implications for health workers/clinicians, public health researchers, and policymakers, as well as for pushing forward biocultural research perspectives on sexuality in human females. Human biologists and biocultural anthropologists are well‐positioned to translate some of these findings into practice recommendations for our own field and for policy and practice recommendations for a broader audience (Gibson & Lawson, 2014, 2015; McKerracher et al, 2020; McKerracher & Nunez de la Mora, 2022). That is, human biologists/biocultural anthropologists generally hold both ‘soft’ skills and relationships necessary for working effectively and collaboratively with human populations in a wide variety of settings and circumstances as well as deep understandings of evolutionary, developmental, and/or cell biology (McKerracher et al, 2020; Thayer et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GDM can also affect their offspring, being associated with a higher prevalence of macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, stillbirth, and, in later life, obesity and metabolic syndrome ( 7 ). According to the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease framework for GDM, exposure to intrauterine hyperglycemia before GDM screening at 24–28 weeks’ gestation is associated with the abnormal growth and development of the fetus ( 8 ). which includes smaller fetuses at 24 weeks’ gestation increased abdominal circumference growth rates ( 9 ), and hyperinsulinemia ( 6 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%