2017
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201715201005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergies between exoplanet surveys and variable star research

Abstract: Abstract. With the discovery of the first transiting extrasolar planetary system back in 1999, a great number of projects started to hunt for other similar systems. Because the incidence rate of such systems was unknown and the length of the shallow transit events is only a few percent of the orbital period, the goal was to monitor continuously as many stars as possible for at least a period of a few months. Small aperture, large field of view automated telescope systems have been installed with a parallel dev… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a natural synergy between the many surveys mentioned in the previous section and variable star research. This is reviewed in some detail by Soszyński (2017), in the case of µL, and Kovacs (2017), in the case of transiting exoplanets. Indeed, our current knowledge of stellar variability across the Milky Way and beyond has been built in part by some of these projects.…”
Section: Curating the New Variable Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a natural synergy between the many surveys mentioned in the previous section and variable star research. This is reviewed in some detail by Soszyński (2017), in the case of µL, and Kovacs (2017), in the case of transiting exoplanets. Indeed, our current knowledge of stellar variability across the Milky Way and beyond has been built in part by some of these projects.…”
Section: Curating the New Variable Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other methods have been developed with similarities to the ones briefly described above. We refer the interested reader to a more complete list of methods in Kovacs (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%