Proceedings of IGARSS '94 - 1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.1994.399276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergetic use of optical and microwave remote sensing data using models and specific features with respect to the sugar beet crop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the model, the total backscatter at a co-polarised channel qq (σ°q q ), is the incoherent sum of the contribution from the vegetation (σ°v eg ) and the soil (σ°s oil ), and the two way attenuation of the vegetation layer (τ 2 ). For a given incidence angle, the co-polarised backscatter can be given by: The water cloud model has been modified and implemented differently by various authors [108][109][110][111] and despite its inconsistency during model implementation, it has found widespread use among the radar modelling community [112] with varying results. Dabrowska-Zielinska et al [113] found the soil moisture contribution to the backscattering coefficient to be predominant over that from the vegetation for C-band, θ = 23 o , while for L-band θ = 35 o , the backscattering coefficient was more sensitive to the vegetation contribution.…”
Section: Soil Moisture Retrieval Using Semi-empirical Scattering Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the model, the total backscatter at a co-polarised channel qq (σ°q q ), is the incoherent sum of the contribution from the vegetation (σ°v eg ) and the soil (σ°s oil ), and the two way attenuation of the vegetation layer (τ 2 ). For a given incidence angle, the co-polarised backscatter can be given by: The water cloud model has been modified and implemented differently by various authors [108][109][110][111] and despite its inconsistency during model implementation, it has found widespread use among the radar modelling community [112] with varying results. Dabrowska-Zielinska et al [113] found the soil moisture contribution to the backscattering coefficient to be predominant over that from the vegetation for C-band, θ = 23 o , while for L-band θ = 35 o , the backscattering coefficient was more sensitive to the vegetation contribution.…”
Section: Soil Moisture Retrieval Using Semi-empirical Scattering Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WCM has been used in many studies (Prévot et al 1993;van Leeuwen et al 1994;Champion 1996;Graham and Harris 2003;Maity et al 2004). However, the application of this model is limited to bare soil areas as the effects of soil surface roughness are not considered in it.…”
Section: Soil Moisture Estimation Models In Vegetated Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Texture measures have been demonstrated to be of utmost importance for the analysis of SAR images (Soares et al, 1997;Fukuda and Hirosawa, 1999;Simard et al, 2000). The synergistic use of optical and radar remote sensing holds new opportunities for land cover classification (Clevers et al, 2000;Kuplich et al, 2000) since the latter provides additional data on vegetation structure and on areas frequently covered by clouds (Leeuwen et al, 1994).…”
Section: Information Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%