2018
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b09739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergetic Organocatalysis for Eliminating Epimerization in Ring-Opening Polymerizations Enables Synthesis of Stereoregular Isotactic Polyester

Abstract: Ring-opening polymerization of O-carboxyanhydrides (OCAs) can furnish polyesters with a diversity of functional groups that are traditionally hard to harvest by polymerization of lactones. Typical ring-opening catalysts are subject to unavoidable racemization of most OCA monomers, which hampers the synthesis of highly isotactic crystalline polymers. Here, we describe an effective bifunctional single-molecule organocatalysis for selective ring-opening polymerization of OCAs without epimerization. The close vici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
107
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1), such as poly(2-hydroxybutanoic acid) [P(2HB)] 18 and poly(2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoic acid) [P(2H3MB)], 18 and poly(mandelic acid). 60 Hetero SC formation occurred between PLA and P(2HB), P(2HB) and P(2H3MB) with the different chemical structures and opposite congurations. Ternary SC formation took place in the blends of L-and D-congured P(2HB)s and L-or D-congured PLA, 18 L-and D-congured P(2H3MB)s and L-or D-congured P(2HB), 61 and D-congured PLA, L-congured P(2HB), and D-congured P(2H3MB) [or L-congured PLA, D-congured P(2HB), and L-congured P(2H3MB)], 62 whereas quaternary SC occurred in the blend of L-and D-congured P(2HB)s and L-and D-congured P(2H3MB)s. 18 Also, SC formation took place in enantiomeric random copolymer blends of poly(L-lactic acid-co-L-2-hydroxybutanoic acid) [P(LLA-co-L-2HB)] (56/44) and poly(D-lactic acid-co-D-2hydroxybutanoic acid) [P(DLA-co-D-2HB)] (52/48) 63 and of poly(L-lactic acid-co-L-2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoic acid) [P(LLA-co-L-2H3MB)] (47/53) and poly(D-lactic acid-co-D-2-hydroxy-3methylbutanoic acid) [P(DLA-co-D-2H3MB)] (47/53), 64 and the staggered random copolymers, L-congured P(LLA-co-L-2HB) (50/50) and D-congured poly(D-2-hydroxybutanoic acid-co-D-2hydroxy-3-methylbutanoic acid) (50/50).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), such as poly(2-hydroxybutanoic acid) [P(2HB)] 18 and poly(2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoic acid) [P(2H3MB)], 18 and poly(mandelic acid). 60 Hetero SC formation occurred between PLA and P(2HB), P(2HB) and P(2H3MB) with the different chemical structures and opposite congurations. Ternary SC formation took place in the blends of L-and D-congured P(2HB)s and L-or D-congured PLA, 18 L-and D-congured P(2H3MB)s and L-or D-congured P(2HB), 61 and D-congured PLA, L-congured P(2HB), and D-congured P(2H3MB) [or L-congured PLA, D-congured P(2HB), and L-congured P(2H3MB)], 62 whereas quaternary SC occurred in the blend of L-and D-congured P(2HB)s and L-and D-congured P(2H3MB)s. 18 Also, SC formation took place in enantiomeric random copolymer blends of poly(L-lactic acid-co-L-2-hydroxybutanoic acid) [P(LLA-co-L-2HB)] (56/44) and poly(D-lactic acid-co-D-2hydroxybutanoic acid) [P(DLA-co-D-2HB)] (52/48) 63 and of poly(L-lactic acid-co-L-2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoic acid) [P(LLA-co-L-2H3MB)] (47/53) and poly(D-lactic acid-co-D-2-hydroxy-3methylbutanoic acid) [P(DLA-co-D-2H3MB)] (47/53), 64 and the staggered random copolymers, L-congured P(LLA-co-L-2HB) (50/50) and D-congured poly(D-2-hydroxybutanoic acid-co-D-2hydroxy-3-methylbutanoic acid) (50/50).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S7-10). Note that considerable epimerization of L-5, which has an acidic αmethine proton, is often observed during ROP, 12,13,53 but this was not so in our system (Fig. S10).…”
Section: Scheme 2 Photoredox Controlled Ring-opening Polymerization Omentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Benefitting from the diversity of their chemical structures, ingeniously designed bifunctional hydrogen‐bonding catalysts enabled to be stereoselective, switchable, and reaction process controllable . Bifunctional single‐molecule hydrogen‐bonding catalyst (Scheme B) which integrating hydrogen‐bonding donor and acceptor group together in one molecule provided a strategy to amplify the synergetic effect between donor and acceptor of catalyst, and thus allows for the use of mild bases as acceptor …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… (A) bifunctional hydrogen‐bonding catalyst, (B) bifunctional single‐molecule hydrogen‐bonding catalyst, (C) single‐group bifunctional thiazoliums. (D) Chemical structure of the catalysts: the cations were represented by I–VII , the fluorine‐containing anions were represented by a–c .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%