2011
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201102357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergetic Effect of Host–Guest Chemistry and Spin Crossover in 3D Hofmann‐like Metal–Organic Frameworks [Fe(bpac)M(CN)4] (M=Pt, Pd, Ni)

Abstract: The synthesis and characterization of a series of three-dimensional (3D) Hofmann-like clathrate porous metal-organic framework (MOF) materials [Fe(bpac)M(CN)(4)] (M=Pt, Pd, and Ni; bpac=bis(4-pyridyl)acetylene) that exhibit spin-crossover behavior is reported. The rigid bpac ligand is longer than the previously used azopyridine and pyrazine and has been selected with the aim to improve both the spin-crossover properties and the porosity of the corresponding porous coordination polymers (PCPs). The 3D network i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(11 reference statements)
4
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For material 2c with guest 3,5-lutidine species, another explanation about the outer high spin state sites may be possible such as π − π interactions between the ligands of 3,5-lutidine coordinated to iron(II) atoms and the guest molecules of 3,5-lutidine in 2D and 3D Hofmann-like coordination polymer compounds [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. While 2c has the 2D host framework, guest 3,5-lutidine molecules probably have π − π interactions with ligand 3,5-lutidine species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For material 2c with guest 3,5-lutidine species, another explanation about the outer high spin state sites may be possible such as π − π interactions between the ligands of 3,5-lutidine coordinated to iron(II) atoms and the guest molecules of 3,5-lutidine in 2D and 3D Hofmann-like coordination polymer compounds [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. While 2c has the 2D host framework, guest 3,5-lutidine molecules probably have π − π interactions with ligand 3,5-lutidine species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large amount of the accommodated guest 3,5-lutidine molecules in the network involved in π − π stacking interactions with the coordinated 3,5-lutidine molecules in the type III decreases the electron density of the ligand molecule and thus explains the elongation of almost all the axial Fe(II)-N bonds, which represent the SCO-active Fe(II) ion centers [15]. By contrast, only a small amount of guest 3,5-lutidine molecules in the type I and II are included within the network; a proportion of iron(II) ion centers in which the coordinated 3,5-lutidine is not involved in π − π stacking interactions conserves an axial compression agreeing with the inactive iron(II) ion centers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Spin-crossover phenomena depending on guest inclusion are already known in several Fe II complexes [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]. Among them, this case, Fe II (bpy)Ni II (CN) 4¨n H 2 O(n = 2.5), is unique in the simultaneity of vapochromism and spin transition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%