1972
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1972.02110110117014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syndrome of Phocomelic Diabetic Embryopathy (Caudal Dysplasia)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sixty‐six individuals were excluded for the following reasons: Twenty‐one patients did not meet the inclusion criteria, either because they had no characteristic facies (Acker, [Patients 1 and 2]; Assemany, Muzzo, & Gardner, ; Burn, Winter, Baraitser, Hall, & Fixsen, [Patient 4]; Caglayan, Gumus, Yikilmaz, Gumus, & Per, ; Chalbaud, Guerrero, Olavarria, & Padilla, ; Ellis, ; Holmes, ; Katdare, ; Lord & Beighton, [Patients 2 and 4]; Mital, Masalawalla, & Desai, ; Tadmor et al, ; Williamson, 1970 [Patients 2, 3, and 4]), or because they did not have the required lower limb involvement (Castro, Peraza, & Zapata, ; Johnson & Sandison, ; Korkmaz et al, ; Russell & Escobar, ; Williamson, [Patient 1]). Three patients presented a distinct phenotypic pattern suggestive of an alternative diagnosis (Depalma, Duray, & Popeo, ; Gupta, Khatri, Agarwal, & Gupta, ; Verma, Jain, & Jain, ). They presented different anomalies such as fracture of long bones, imperforate anus, bladder anomalies (Depalma et al, ), encephalocele (Verma et al, ), and meningoencephalocele, heart defect and preaxial limb reduction defects (Gupta et al, ), the first two in the absence of karyotype information. Twenty‐nine patients were reported without sufficient information to confirm their diagnosis (Apte, Attarde, Patil, Dahiphale, & Ahirrao, ; Burn et al, [Patient 3]; Cuillier, Carasset, Lemaire, Deshayes, & Alessandri, ; Filly, Robnett‐Filly, & Filly, ; Herreros & Franco, ; Holthusen, [Patient 2]; Inati, Nores, Breg, & Petty, [Patients 1 and 2]; Iohom, Lyons, & Casey, ; Kastanek & Michael, ; Lord & Beighton, [Patients 3, 5–9]; Luisin et al, [Patients 1 and 2]Maisels & Stilwel, [Patients 1 to 3]; McCracken, ; Nowaczyk, Huggins, Fleming, & Mohide, [Patient 3]; Pryde, Zelop, & Pauli, ; Singh, Chandra, Mandal Ravi, & Kumari, ; Urban, Ramus, Stannard, & Rogers, ; Vecchio, Salzano, Vecchio, Di Filippo, & Roccella, ; WooSuk & Song, ; Zierei...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixty‐six individuals were excluded for the following reasons: Twenty‐one patients did not meet the inclusion criteria, either because they had no characteristic facies (Acker, [Patients 1 and 2]; Assemany, Muzzo, & Gardner, ; Burn, Winter, Baraitser, Hall, & Fixsen, [Patient 4]; Caglayan, Gumus, Yikilmaz, Gumus, & Per, ; Chalbaud, Guerrero, Olavarria, & Padilla, ; Ellis, ; Holmes, ; Katdare, ; Lord & Beighton, [Patients 2 and 4]; Mital, Masalawalla, & Desai, ; Tadmor et al, ; Williamson, 1970 [Patients 2, 3, and 4]), or because they did not have the required lower limb involvement (Castro, Peraza, & Zapata, ; Johnson & Sandison, ; Korkmaz et al, ; Russell & Escobar, ; Williamson, [Patient 1]). Three patients presented a distinct phenotypic pattern suggestive of an alternative diagnosis (Depalma, Duray, & Popeo, ; Gupta, Khatri, Agarwal, & Gupta, ; Verma, Jain, & Jain, ). They presented different anomalies such as fracture of long bones, imperforate anus, bladder anomalies (Depalma et al, ), encephalocele (Verma et al, ), and meningoencephalocele, heart defect and preaxial limb reduction defects (Gupta et al, ), the first two in the absence of karyotype information. Twenty‐nine patients were reported without sufficient information to confirm their diagnosis (Apte, Attarde, Patil, Dahiphale, & Ahirrao, ; Burn et al, [Patient 3]; Cuillier, Carasset, Lemaire, Deshayes, & Alessandri, ; Filly, Robnett‐Filly, & Filly, ; Herreros & Franco, ; Holthusen, [Patient 2]; Inati, Nores, Breg, & Petty, [Patients 1 and 2]; Iohom, Lyons, & Casey, ; Kastanek & Michael, ; Lord & Beighton, [Patients 3, 5–9]; Luisin et al, [Patients 1 and 2]Maisels & Stilwel, [Patients 1 to 3]; McCracken, ; Nowaczyk, Huggins, Fleming, & Mohide, [Patient 3]; Pryde, Zelop, & Pauli, ; Singh, Chandra, Mandal Ravi, & Kumari, ; Urban, Ramus, Stannard, & Rogers, ; Vecchio, Salzano, Vecchio, Di Filippo, & Roccella, ; WooSuk & Song, ; Zierei...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include The Kuskokwim Syndrome [64,86], Mietens syndrome [59], Weyers oligodactyly syndrome [85], Roberts pseudothalidomide syndrome [28], CAD complex [77]/Neu Laxova syndrome [75], Sacral agenesis (caudal regression) [3]/meningomyelocele, chromosome defects [ 16, 631 severe amyoplasia [38].…”
Section: Other Conditions With Limb Pterygiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the several anomalies observed in this case, only "caudal regression" (Lenz and Maier 1964;Rusnak and Driscoll 1965;Stern et al 1965;Passarge and Lenz 1966;Fields et al 1968;Ku~era 1971;Assemany et al 1972), gross skeletal malformations (Molsted-Pedersen et al 1964;Ku~era 1971) and congenital heart defects (Ku~era 1971; Rowland et al 1973) appear frequently in the offspring of diabetic mothers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Among these malformations, "caudal regression" is best known (Lenz and Maier 1964;Rusnak and Driscoll 1965;Stern et al 1965;Passarge and Lenz 1966;Fields et al 1968;Ku~era 1971;Assemany et al 1972). This defect involves reduction Offprint requests to: Harold J. Bruyere Jr., Department of Pathology, K4/413 University of Wisconsin Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA of coccygeal and sacral vertebral segments, at times with deficiency or absence of the (proximal) femora.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%