“…Sixty‐six individuals were excluded for the following reasons: - Twenty‐one patients did not meet the inclusion criteria, either because they had no characteristic facies (Acker, [Patients 1 and 2]; Assemany, Muzzo, & Gardner, ; Burn, Winter, Baraitser, Hall, & Fixsen, [Patient 4]; Caglayan, Gumus, Yikilmaz, Gumus, & Per, ; Chalbaud, Guerrero, Olavarria, & Padilla, ; Ellis, ; Holmes, ; Katdare, ; Lord & Beighton, [Patients 2 and 4]; Mital, Masalawalla, & Desai, ; Tadmor et al, ; Williamson, 1970 [Patients 2, 3, and 4]), or because they did not have the required lower limb involvement (Castro, Peraza, & Zapata, ; Johnson & Sandison, ; Korkmaz et al, ; Russell & Escobar, ; Williamson, [Patient 1]).
- Three patients presented a distinct phenotypic pattern suggestive of an alternative diagnosis (Depalma, Duray, & Popeo, ; Gupta, Khatri, Agarwal, & Gupta, ; Verma, Jain, & Jain, ). They presented different anomalies such as fracture of long bones, imperforate anus, bladder anomalies (Depalma et al, ), encephalocele (Verma et al, ), and meningoencephalocele, heart defect and preaxial limb reduction defects (Gupta et al, ), the first two in the absence of karyotype information.
- Twenty‐nine patients were reported without sufficient information to confirm their diagnosis (Apte, Attarde, Patil, Dahiphale, & Ahirrao, ; Burn et al, [Patient 3]; Cuillier, Carasset, Lemaire, Deshayes, & Alessandri, ; Filly, Robnett‐Filly, & Filly, ; Herreros & Franco, ; Holthusen, [Patient 2]; Inati, Nores, Breg, & Petty, [Patients 1 and 2]; Iohom, Lyons, & Casey, ; Kastanek & Michael, ; Lord & Beighton, [Patients 3, 5–9]; Luisin et al, [Patients 1 and 2]Maisels & Stilwel, [Patients 1 to 3]; McCracken, ; Nowaczyk, Huggins, Fleming, & Mohide, [Patient 3]; Pryde, Zelop, & Pauli, ; Singh, Chandra, Mandal Ravi, & Kumari, ; Urban, Ramus, Stannard, & Rogers, ; Vecchio, Salzano, Vecchio, Di Filippo, & Roccella, ; WooSuk & Song, ; Zierei...
…”