2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syndrome du jour: The historiography and moral implications of Diagnosing Darwin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These diagnoses may be divided into two groups which may be psychogenic/psychological and recognized psychiatric disorders. The first group has been presented in depth by Buchanan and will not be reviewed individually here [ 1 ]. Psychogenic diagnoses once flourished, including numerous psychoanalytical diagnoses which have been proposed as the underlying cause for Darwin’s illness.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These diagnoses may be divided into two groups which may be psychogenic/psychological and recognized psychiatric disorders. The first group has been presented in depth by Buchanan and will not be reviewed individually here [ 1 ]. Psychogenic diagnoses once flourished, including numerous psychoanalytical diagnoses which have been proposed as the underlying cause for Darwin’s illness.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…… we could surely conclude that something is amiss here, that they cannot all be right. We may even wonder if they are all wrong ” [ 1 ]. Jared Goldstein summed this up succinctly: “ Take your pick, there’s something for everybody: hypochondriasis, refractive error, depression, arsenic poisoning, Oedipal complex, pigeon allergy, familial psychosis, chronic brucellosis, chronic anxiety, Chagas’ disease, and more ” [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Environmental History (White, 2004). In the 21st century genetic data became a source for some historians, again in disputed ways; historians of medicine have embraced or rejected the opportunity to perform retrospective diagnoses through genetic sequencing and bioarchaeology (Buchanan, 2021;Cooter, 2010;Karenberg, 2009;McGough, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though both subdisciplines participated in the social and cultural turn at the end of the twentieth century that questioned such empirical work, there is still no shortage of historians of medicine pursuing similar empirically orientated work, just as there are those counting rainfall in Environmental History (White, 2004). In the 21st century genetic data became a source for some historians, again in disputed ways; historians of medicine have embraced or rejected the opportunity to perform retrospective diagnoses through genetic sequencing and bioarchaeology (Buchanan, 2021; Cooter, 2010; Karenberg, 2009; McGough, 2005). Historians of pandemic and epidemic diseases have made the strongest case for absorbing STEM methodologies, most obviously Monica Green's work (2012, 2015) on using scientific approaches to reconsider the history of plague and other pandemics (for an excellent history of modern plague from an Environmental History perspective see Staub, 2022.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%