2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syndiospecific polymerization of styrene catalyzed by half-titanocene catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This steric advantage made monomer styrene insertion relative to chain termination mainly by β‐hydrogen elimination or sterically stabilize the active species. We studied the kinetics of styrene polymerization catalyzed by the half‐titanocenes examined 30. It was found that complexes with ligands of phenyl ring substituents were more stable and had higher catalytic activity than did complexes with no phenyl ring substituents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This steric advantage made monomer styrene insertion relative to chain termination mainly by β‐hydrogen elimination or sterically stabilize the active species. We studied the kinetics of styrene polymerization catalyzed by the half‐titanocenes examined 30. It was found that complexes with ligands of phenyl ring substituents were more stable and had higher catalytic activity than did complexes with no phenyl ring substituents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Table 2 it can be noticed that the polymerization temperature obviously influenced the catalyst activity. The catalyst activity reached the highest value of 8.1 Â 10 6 g PE/mol Ti h at 70 8C, but the catalytic activity was less than the highest value whatever the temperature was less or higher than 70 8C [31][32][33][34]. Cat.…”
Section: Effects Of Polymerization Conditions On Ethylene (Co)polymermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The residue was extracted with boiling tetrahydrofuran (THF) for 12 h to remove S ‐E random copolymer. The THF‐insoluble fraction was extracted with boiling CHCl 3 for 12 h to remove the insoluble sPS and PE homopolymer 11, 39–43. The CHCl 3 ‐soluble fraction (aPS‐b‐random copolymer‐b‐PE) was isolated by evaporation of solvent, dried under vacuum at 50°C, weighted, and analyzed by DSC, WAXD, GPC, 13 C‐NMR, and 1 H‐NMR spectroscopy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Catalyst system: CpTiCl 3 /Zn/BDGE/St = 8/12/1/300; monomer: Styrene (3 mL); radical polymerization of styrene was carried out at 90 o C for 2.5 h in 1, 4‐dioxane (IE = 0.70, M n = 1.0 × 10 4 , MWD = 1.30). When the experiment was performed in a 300‐mL Schlenk following the literature,31, 39–43 the mixture color was changed into lime‐green, demonstrating the formation of metallocene complex radical CpTi • (III)Cl 2 . FTIR result confirmed that the opening of the epoxide ring of BDGE by metallocene complex radical CpTi • (III)Cl 2 took place by entire disappearing of the signal at 910.4 cm −1 attributed to epoxy group …”
mentioning
confidence: 85%