2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.21.432077
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchrony of mind and body are distinct in mother-child dyads

Abstract: Hyperscanning studies have begun to unravel the brain mechanisms underlying social interaction, indicating a functional role for interpersonal neural synchronization (INS), yet the mechanisms that drive INS are poorly understood. While interpersonal synchrony is considered a multimodal phenomenon, it is not clear how different biological and behavioral synchrony markers are related to each other. The current study, thus, addresses whether INS is functionally-distinct from synchrony in other systems - specifica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 53 included studies are summarized in Supplemental 2 and marked with an asterisk in the Reference list. Sample sizes ranged from 33 (Reindl et al, 2018;Silva et al, 2018) to 454 (Crespo et al, 2017); 57% (n ¼ 30) had fewer than 100 participants or dyads. Eight of the 53 studies were longitudinal (15%; Bowie et al, 2013;Jones et al, 2014;Kehoe et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2009;Kliewer et al, 2004;Mazursky et al, 2015;Su et al, 2018;Tan & Smith, 2019).…”
Section: Overview Of the 53 Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 53 included studies are summarized in Supplemental 2 and marked with an asterisk in the Reference list. Sample sizes ranged from 33 (Reindl et al, 2018;Silva et al, 2018) to 454 (Crespo et al, 2017); 57% (n ¼ 30) had fewer than 100 participants or dyads. Eight of the 53 studies were longitudinal (15%; Bowie et al, 2013;Jones et al, 2014;Kehoe et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2009;Kliewer et al, 2004;Mazursky et al, 2015;Su et al, 2018;Tan & Smith, 2019).…”
Section: Overview Of the 53 Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if turn-taking is linked to neural synchrony already in infantcaregiver interactions this might point to neural synchrony as a potential shared mechanism underlying turn-taking across ontogeny. Given that brain rhythms undergo protracted development in humans [25], mutual adaptation of rhythmic brain activities, resulting in neural synchrony during turn-taking, could be an important factor in shaping the development of infant brain dynamics [26]. In the present study, we therefore tested whether interpersonal neural synchrony relates to turn-taking already in mother-infant dyads.…”
Section: (A) Mechanisms Of Early Turn-takingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most methods used in hyperscanning fMRI and fNIRS studies are static or temporal correlation (Cui et al, 2012;Reindl et al, 2022;Balconi and Angioletti, 2023;Morgan et al, 2023;Wei et al, 2023) and Granger-based causality (Zhang et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2020Chen et al, , 2023Pan et al, 2021;Zhao et al, 2022). Examples of the former method are the partial correlation coefficient and wavelet transform coherence (WTC).…”
Section: Interaction-mediated Brain-to-brain Activity Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%