2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06586-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronous motor imagery and visual feedback of finger movement elicit the moving rubber hand illusion, at least in illusion-susceptible individuals

Abstract: Recent evidence suggests that imagined auditory and visual sensory stimuli can be integrated with real sensory information from a different sensory modality to change the perception of external events via cross-modal multisensory integration mechanisms. Here, we explored whether imagined voluntary movements can integrate visual and proprioceptive cues to change how we perceive our own limbs in space. Participants viewed a robotic hand wearing a glove repetitively moving its right index finger up and down at a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 110 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we predicted that participants will still adapt to the arms bending in opposite directions and feel a sense of embodiment towards the unnatural avatar in our study, as long as the visual movements temporally match their body movements. Based on our sensitivity to temporal discrepancies in multisensory integration ( Berger et al, 2023 ), we predicted that temporal visuomotor synchrony will play a more dominant role than spatial synchrony in inducing sense of embodiment. In other words, even if the movements are spatially incongruent, as long as they are temporally synchronous, we predicted that the participants will experience a sense of embodiment stronger than what they feel with natural movements with a temporal delay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we predicted that participants will still adapt to the arms bending in opposite directions and feel a sense of embodiment towards the unnatural avatar in our study, as long as the visual movements temporally match their body movements. Based on our sensitivity to temporal discrepancies in multisensory integration ( Berger et al, 2023 ), we predicted that temporal visuomotor synchrony will play a more dominant role than spatial synchrony in inducing sense of embodiment. In other words, even if the movements are spatially incongruent, as long as they are temporally synchronous, we predicted that the participants will experience a sense of embodiment stronger than what they feel with natural movements with a temporal delay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%