2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronous metastatic gastric cancer-molecular background and clinical implications with special attention to mismatch repair deficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A subgroup analysis in the same cohort showed that the prognostic advantage of MSI-H is present within the same disease stage in resectable gastric cancer and even holds up for stage IV disease [41]. However, this prognostic value of MSI in stage IV gastric cancer was not seen in a different series of 510 stage I-IV gastric cancer patients that underwent gastrectomy including 83 MSI-H tumors [47].…”
Section: Prevalence Of Msi In Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A subgroup analysis in the same cohort showed that the prognostic advantage of MSI-H is present within the same disease stage in resectable gastric cancer and even holds up for stage IV disease [41]. However, this prognostic value of MSI in stage IV gastric cancer was not seen in a different series of 510 stage I-IV gastric cancer patients that underwent gastrectomy including 83 MSI-H tumors [47].…”
Section: Prevalence Of Msi In Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Between 6 and 24% of resected gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas are reported to be MSI-H [20,[34][35][36][37][38][39], and this may even mount up to 48% in patients of 85 years and older [40]. However, the percentage sharply drops to less than 10% in patients with synchronous metastatic disease [41], and less than 5% in a beyond-second line treatment setting [19]. MSI is only rarely observed in non-junctional esophageal cancers [42][43][44].…”
Section: Prevalence Of Msi In Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to TCGA, the MSI subgroup is linked with hypermutation, gastric CpG island methylator phenotype, MLH1 silencing, and mitotic pathways [ 1 ]. In the last few years, many publications described MSI from a clinical point of view, being found in 5.6% to 33.3% of all gastric cancers and strongly associated with female sex, older age, intestinal histotype, middle/lower gastric position, N0 status, and TNM stage I/II with favorable overall survival [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. It is important to underline that MSI is not a homogenous group and it has been shown that MSI is a prognostic factor because of the association with tumor localization and Lauren classification [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular diagnosis of MSI gastric cancer is of highest importance, especially before multidisciplinary treatment. It presents different responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and requires specific surgical treatment in synchronous metastases, includes the possibility of tailored lymphadenectomy, and stratifies for the application of targeted therapies [ 3 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, recent evidence points to a positive prognostic role for MSI-H status in surgically treated stage IV AGC 18 , though no data are available on the role of MSI status neither in 6 patients undergoing metastasectomy nor preoperative chemotherapy followed by metastasectomy. In the advance-disease setting, the potential predictive role of MSI status warrants further investigation particularly in light of the suggested benefit of oligometastatic GC from multimodality approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%