2020
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201901721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronous Electrical Conductance‐ and Electron Tunnelling‐Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy Measurements

Abstract: The requirement to separate topographical effects from surface electrochemistry information is a major limitation of scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). With many applications of SECM involving the study of (semi)conducting electrode surfaces, the hybridisation of SECM with scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) or a surface conductance probe would provide the ultimate topographical imaging capability to SECM, but previous attempts are limited. Here, the conversion of a general scanning electrochemical p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tip current enhanced by redox-mediated electron tunneling was used only for the termination of the tip approach and was excluded during the post-imaging fit of approach curves (e.g., Figure C). By contrast, the tip current enhanced by solvent-mediated electron tunneling was used in a recent study to separately image the substrate topography from the substrate reactivity, which was imaged in the feedback mode at a longer distance . The combination of SECM with STM requires a conductive substrate in contrast to the intelligent mode based only on the SECM feedback mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tip current enhanced by redox-mediated electron tunneling was used only for the termination of the tip approach and was excluded during the post-imaging fit of approach curves (e.g., Figure C). By contrast, the tip current enhanced by solvent-mediated electron tunneling was used in a recent study to separately image the substrate topography from the substrate reactivity, which was imaged in the feedback mode at a longer distance . The combination of SECM with STM requires a conductive substrate in contrast to the intelligent mode based only on the SECM feedback mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike conventional tunneling experiments ( e.g. , STM junctions and electrochemical STM ), in the tunneling mode of SECM, no voltage is applied between the tip and the substrate, and the tip current at short separation distances is due to the electrochemical reaction occurring at the nano-sample surface (Scheme A). As an SECM tip approaches a conductive particle attached to an insulating support, the tunneling resistance decreases exponentially with decreasing separation distance ( d ), and the tip potential begins to drive the charge-transfer process at the NP/solution interface. , The particle potential changes over ∼2 nm tip displacement from the open circuit value to the tip potential ( E T ) value, and the metal NP begins to act as a part of the nanoelectrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances have enabled the distance between sample surfaces and probes 1 to be controlled with nanometer-level accuracy using shear force, 2,3 intermittent contact, 4 ion conductance, 5 atomic force, 6 and tunneling current. [7][8][9][10] Furthermore, with advances in probe miniaturization technology, the resolution of SECM has been improved to the nanometer scale. 1,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16] Consequently, a method is needed for the facile and reproducible preparation of nanoelectrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] Furthermore, with advances in probe miniaturization technology, the resolution of SECM has been improved to the nanometer scale. 1,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16] Consequently, a method is needed for the facile and reproducible preparation of nanoelectrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation