2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01685.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronous diffuse malignant mesothelioma and carcinomas in asbestos‐exposed individuals

Abstract: Synchronous malignant mesothelioma with carcinomas in asbestos-exposed workers is rare and identified in 1.8% of 500 malignant mesotheliomas in this series. In most cases the carcinoma represents a primary bronchogenic neoplasm. Primary lung carcinomas are recognized to be asbestos related only when occurring in association with asbestosis. In this series this combination (bronchogenic carcinoma and asbestosis) was seen in four (0.8%) cases. In post-mortem cases for possible malignant mesothelioma it is import… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[19][20][21] In addition, cases of a collision tumor formed by a mesothelioma and a small cell lung carcinoma, although exceedingly rare, have also been documented. 22 Microscopically, the cytoplasmic features of small cell mesothelioma differ subtly from those of small cell lung carcinoma in that, although both types of tumors exhibit a high nuclear cytoplasmic ratio, the amount of cytoplasm in the mesotheliomas with small cell features is greater. In small cell lung carcinomas, cell borders are rarely seen and the nuclei often present a 'saltand-pepper' chromatin and nuclear molding, and lack nucleoli, while in small cell mesotheliomas, the nuclei are more vesicular with finely granular and dispersed chromatin, they more often contain small, but well-defined, nucleoli, and exhibit no nuclear molding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21] In addition, cases of a collision tumor formed by a mesothelioma and a small cell lung carcinoma, although exceedingly rare, have also been documented. 22 Microscopically, the cytoplasmic features of small cell mesothelioma differ subtly from those of small cell lung carcinoma in that, although both types of tumors exhibit a high nuclear cytoplasmic ratio, the amount of cytoplasm in the mesotheliomas with small cell features is greater. In small cell lung carcinomas, cell borders are rarely seen and the nuclei often present a 'saltand-pepper' chromatin and nuclear molding, and lack nucleoli, while in small cell mesotheliomas, the nuclei are more vesicular with finely granular and dispersed chromatin, they more often contain small, but well-defined, nucleoli, and exhibit no nuclear molding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, numerous studies have investigated the co-existence of mesothelioma with other primary malignancies [77][78][79][80] . The association between mesothelioma and other cancers, such as nonHodgkin lymphoma or hepatocellular carcinoma, could indicate a role of immune impairment in the genesis of mesothelioma 78,80) .…”
Section: Co-factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Furthermore, cases of concomitant mesothelioma and squamous carcinoma have been documented. 4,5 In one instance, a mesothelioma was intimately admixed with a squamous carcinoma of the lung forming a collision tumor. 4 Over the past two decades, numerous studies have been published on the value of immunohistochemistry as an ancillary technique in the diagnosis of mesotheliomas and there is general agreement that this method is extremely useful in the diagnosis of these tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 In one instance, a mesothelioma was intimately admixed with a squamous carcinoma of the lung forming a collision tumor. 4 Over the past two decades, numerous studies have been published on the value of immunohistochemistry as an ancillary technique in the diagnosis of mesotheliomas and there is general agreement that this method is extremely useful in the diagnosis of these tumors. The primary focus of the large majority of these investigations, however, has been on the distinction between epithelioid mesotheliomas and adenocarcinomas, especially those originating in the lung, but very little has been published comparing the immunoprofiles of epithelioid mesotheliomas and squamous carcinomas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%