2018
DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.12.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a national survey of surgeon opinions on simultaneous resection and multidisciplinary cooperation

Abstract: There was general agreement between CRS and general surgeons on numerous topics, but additional education is required with regard to HPB surgical capabilities and to provide truly individualized patient-centered care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study represents the largest survey of North American surgeons regarding simultaneous resection and our results on perceived differences in barriers are compatible with clinical practice and a similar, previously published smaller survey. 31 Even though our study may reflect opinion and not actual practice, the internal consistency we found throughout the survey and the logic to responses, conceivably reflect surgeons' perceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Our study represents the largest survey of North American surgeons regarding simultaneous resection and our results on perceived differences in barriers are compatible with clinical practice and a similar, previously published smaller survey. 31 Even though our study may reflect opinion and not actual practice, the internal consistency we found throughout the survey and the logic to responses, conceivably reflect surgeons' perceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Furthermore, the survey invitation was indirectly delivered through mass email (CSSO) or mass newsletters (CAGS/CSCRS), in which the eligible members may not have read the invitation to participate in this study, potentially explaining the low numbers of total responses. However, our total number of responses was comparable to another national CRLM survey study that had used CAGS and CSCRS societies for survey delivery to surgeons (response n = 58) [ 28 ]. When interpretating our thematic extraction results, the response bias cannot not be eliminated, as this study may have attracted respondents who have stronger interest in this topic than others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Repeated liver resection of CRCLM can achieve comparable perioperative mortality and long-term survival rates as primary liver resection [39]. For patients with CRC and synchronous liver metastases, simultaneous resection is safe and feasible [40,41]. Prognosis prediction can help identify patients who are most likely to benefit from various treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%