2021
DOI: 10.1051/ita/2021005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronizing series-parallel deterministic finite automata with loops and related problems

Abstract: We study the problem DFA-SW of determining if a given deterministic finite automaton A possesses a synchronizing word of length at most k for automata whose (multi-)graphs are TTSPL, i.e., series-parallel, plus allowing some self-loops. While DFA-SW remains NP-complete on TTSPL automata, we also find (further) restrictions with efficient (parameterized) algorithms. We also study the (parameterized) complexity of related problems, for instance, extension variants of the synchronizing word problem, or the proble… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following, we will concentrate on the length-lexicographical ordering ≤ ll as the partial order, where v ≤ ll w means that either |v| < |w| or that |v| = |w| and v ≤ lex w, where v ≤ lex w refers to a lexicographical (total) order induced by a given total order on the alphabet. In and in Bruchertseifer and Fernau (2021), we are also discussing other (natural) partial orders. It should be noted that in some cases, the extension variants are solvable in polynomial time, while other cases lead to NP-or co-NP-hard problems.…”
Section: Extensions and Orderings Of Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the following, we will concentrate on the length-lexicographical ordering ≤ ll as the partial order, where v ≤ ll w means that either |v| < |w| or that |v| = |w| and v ≤ lex w, where v ≤ lex w refers to a lexicographical (total) order induced by a given total order on the alphabet. In and in Bruchertseifer and Fernau (2021), we are also discussing other (natural) partial orders. It should be noted that in some cases, the extension variants are solvable in polynomial time, while other cases lead to NP-or co-NP-hard problems.…”
Section: Extensions and Orderings Of Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bruchertseifer and Fernau (2021), we also showed that EXT DFA-SW-≤ | is W[3]-hard, where | refers to the (scattered) subsequence ordering. But it is an open question if this extension problem belongs to W[3].…”
Section: Extensions and Orderings Of Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since δ ′ agrees with δ on every word in Σ * it holds that δ ′ (Q, w) ⊆ S. The only state in Q ′ \Q is r and for r we have δ ′ (r, w) = r. Hence, δ ′ (Q ′ , w) ⊆ (S ∪{r}) and δ ′ (Q ′ , wc) = {t}. The relation R = (Q\S)× {r} demands that while reading wc on the set Q we reach a situation on which r is active but no state in Q\S is active 5 and does not become active again anymore. This is the case when reading the prefix w of wc since δ ′ (Q, w) ⊆ S and δ ′ (r, w) = r. Together with δ ′ (Q ′ , wc) = {t} ⊆ S we get R ⊆≺ 1 wc .…”
Section: • ∝mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will also observe W [1]-hardness results from the reductions given in [15]. So far, only little is known (see for example [10,24,5]) about the parameterized complexity of all the different synchronization variants considered in the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%