2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1801759115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronized mechanical oscillations at the cell–matrix interface in the formation of tensile tissue

Abstract: The formation of uniaxial fibrous tissues with defined viscoelastic properties implies the existence of an orchestrated mechanical interaction between the cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix. This study addresses the nature of this interaction. The hypothesis is that this mechanical interplay underpins the mechanical development of the tissue. In embryonic tendon tissue, an early event in the development of a mechanically robust tissue is the interaction of the pointed tips of extracellular collagen fibr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(57 reference statements)
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed two main behaviours: a first population of cells exhibited static spreading, and extended slowly their two ends in opposite directions without net displacement of their centre-of-mass (Figure 1d and Supplementary Video 1), while a second population displayed strikingly regular oscillatory trajectories, with an amplitude that could significantly exceed the cell size (Figure 1e and Supplementary Video 2). While oscillatory patterns in cell migration 29,30 , and more generally in cell dynamics 31,32,33 , have been reported for various cell types, and could be attributed to different intracellular processes, we argue below that the oscillations that we observe have so far unrevealed features, which we show originate from a so far unreported mechanism. Both observed behaviours were approximately equally distributed over the cell population, whereas behaviours that did not fall in these two classes – akin to persistent random motion – remained negligible.…”
supporting
confidence: 45%
“…We observed two main behaviours: a first population of cells exhibited static spreading, and extended slowly their two ends in opposite directions without net displacement of their centre-of-mass (Figure 1d and Supplementary Video 1), while a second population displayed strikingly regular oscillatory trajectories, with an amplitude that could significantly exceed the cell size (Figure 1e and Supplementary Video 2). While oscillatory patterns in cell migration 29,30 , and more generally in cell dynamics 31,32,33 , have been reported for various cell types, and could be attributed to different intracellular processes, we argue below that the oscillations that we observe have so far unrevealed features, which we show originate from a so far unreported mechanism. Both observed behaviours were approximately equally distributed over the cell population, whereas behaviours that did not fall in these two classes – akin to persistent random motion – remained negligible.…”
supporting
confidence: 45%
“…Whilst collagen fibrils have been located within fibripositors at the plasma membrane by electron microscopy, and cell culture studies have highlighted the importance of extrinsic mechanical forces (e.g. see 3639 ), cell-derived forces 40, 41 , combined mechanical anchoring and TGF β 1 cell activation 42 , and fluid flow 43 in generating an aligned network of collagen fibrils, mechanistic insights into how cells assemble collagen fibrils at the plasma membrane were lacking. Throughout the current study, collagen fibrils and Cy3-colI labelled fibrils were only seen in close proximity to the plasma membrane; fibrils unattached to cells and at distances from cells were not observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing, 5 min, was also chosen based on a previous in vivo experiment . The bioreactor used in this study was custom‐made by David Holmes at the University of Manchester and allows for two constructs to be stretched at the same time by a single‐stepper motor . Loading was performed in pre‐warmed medium (37°C), but the bioreactor was kept at room temperature (23°C).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%