Synchronized Detection of Evoked Potentials to Drive a High Information Transfer Rate Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface Application

Katyal, Akshay; Singla, Rajesh

doi:10.14326/abe.10.58

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 41 publications

(47 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…EEG has several types of signals: Slow Cortical Potential (SCP), Event-Related Desynchronization (ERD), Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEP), and Event-related Potential [7,8]. ERP signals reflect the presence of bioelectric activity associated with stimulation processing [9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterization of EEG-P300 Signals in Drug Users

Dayanti,

Kusumandari,

Kusumaningrum

et al. 2023

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of drugs for a long time can cause changes in the structure of the brain’s performance. Drug detection is usually done using laboratory testing methods such as urine, blood, and saliva tests. With the development of technology, changes in brain activity can be presented in the form of EEG signals. This study aims to locate the features of the P300 signal and the more effective stimulus to generate the P300 signal. The EEG input data uses secondary data consisting of 40 male participants with an age range of 25–40 years. The data collection process contains a stimulus to generate a P300 signal and record for 50 seconds using 19 channels and a 10-20 system. The results of the study show that the P300 signal features can affect the formation of amplitude and latency. The more effective stimulus in generating the P300 signal for drug users is a similar stimulus shabu with an amplitude value of 18,3 μV and a fast response latency of 252,9 ms.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%