1986
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(86)90026-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronization of estrus in embryo transfer recipients receiving demi-embryos with Syncro-Mate B or estrumate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
1
1

Year Published

1986
1986
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with Miksch et al (1978), but in contrast to earlier reports indicating that estrus synchronization rate was higher in heifers than in cows following progestagen treatments in combination with PGF given the day before or at the end of treatment (Heersche et al 1979;Beal and Good 1986;Brown et al 1986;Whittier et al 1986). In contrast to previous reports (Burfening et al 1978;King et al 1982;Wenkoff 1987), interval from induction to onset of estrus was similar in heifers and cows in the Control and SMB-PGF groups.…”
contrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This is in agreement with Miksch et al (1978), but in contrast to earlier reports indicating that estrus synchronization rate was higher in heifers than in cows following progestagen treatments in combination with PGF given the day before or at the end of treatment (Heersche et al 1979;Beal and Good 1986;Brown et al 1986;Whittier et al 1986). In contrast to previous reports (Burfening et al 1978;King et al 1982;Wenkoff 1987), interval from induction to onset of estrus was similar in heifers and cows in the Control and SMB-PGF groups.…”
contrasting
confidence: 57%
“…However, Pace and Sullivan (1980) reported no advantage in pregnancy rate for cows treated with Syncro-Mate B with calf removal compared with no calf removal in a study utilizing 2,015 postpartum beef cows from 10 ranches. Similarly, Brown et al (1986) showed no advantage for calf removal compared with no calf removal after Syncro-Mate B treatment. Cows in both these studies were bred according to estrus; this may explain some of the difference between these studies and that of Kiser et al (1980).…”
Section: Progestogen-estrogen Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When beef heifers were treated with a 7-d norgestomet implant and injected with PGF2a on d 6 or 7 after implantation, 93% showed estrus within 5 d and 62% of these conceived, which was similar to a 60% fxstservice conception rate for controls (Heersche et al, 1979). Combined with an injection of alfaprostol at implant removal, a 9-d norgestomet implant was as effective as Syncro-Mate B in postpartum beef cows (Bed et al, 1984;Brown et al, 1986). Whittier et aI.…”
Section: Progestogen-prostaglandin Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…É possível atribuir também à compensação da disfunção luteal decorrente da quantidade de progesterona liberada pelo implante insuficiente para 94 promover uma gestação num primeiro momento, porém, adequada para promover a retomada da ciclicidade como sugerida por King et al (1986), ou ainda pela insuficiente produção do hormônio luteinizante após a retirada do implante, conforme referiram-se Hixon et al (1981), bem como em decorrência da combinação entre esses e outros fatores, como relatado por Jöchile (1993). Além disso, durante a estação de monta, as vacas estavam submetidas à pastagens de boa qualidade, o que contribuiu para melhora do balanço energético e ECC, consequentemente, saírem do anestro nutricional e ficarem prenhas.…”
Section: Taxa De Prenhezunclassified