2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-38987-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronization in Groups and Societies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extroverted dyads, in contrast (thus without introverts), showed more flexible, less predictable, and less consistent conversations (fewer laminar states) but enjoyed these conversations more. As simulated and reported by Nowak et al (2002Nowak et al ( , 2020, in interactions between dissimilar individuals, one of them is likely to adopt the behavior of the interacting partner subsequently (a process known as social influence), especially when the partner's behavior is strong and somehow corresponds to a "positive" state, which could also be linked to dominant behaviors (see Depue & Collins, 1999;Larsen et al, 2020). In other words, one of the interactants is likely to change their behavior to foster synchronization, thus s/he leaves their own equilibrium (baseline) to match the attractor state of the other individual (Nowak et al, 2020).…”
Section: Extraversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extroverted dyads, in contrast (thus without introverts), showed more flexible, less predictable, and less consistent conversations (fewer laminar states) but enjoyed these conversations more. As simulated and reported by Nowak et al (2002Nowak et al ( , 2020, in interactions between dissimilar individuals, one of them is likely to adopt the behavior of the interacting partner subsequently (a process known as social influence), especially when the partner's behavior is strong and somehow corresponds to a "positive" state, which could also be linked to dominant behaviors (see Depue & Collins, 1999;Larsen et al, 2020). In other words, one of the interactants is likely to change their behavior to foster synchronization, thus s/he leaves their own equilibrium (baseline) to match the attractor state of the other individual (Nowak et al, 2020).…”
Section: Extraversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interacting partner in a dyad is henceforth understood as the psychological environment in which each individual is engaged, and where individual differences surface (Asendorf, 2017;Leary, 1957;Roche & Cain, 2021;Sullivan et al, 1953). Individuals tend to synchronize more readily when they possess similar features (similarity) which could be perceived from body motion information associated with personality traits (e.g., Koppensteiner, 2013), as behavioral states are theorized to synchronize more readily when smaller system adjustments are required to reach a dyadic attractor state with systemic stability (Nowak et al, 2020;Rivera et al, 2010), which connects dyadic synchronization to improved person-environment fit (e.g., Van Vianen, 2018;Vleugels et al, 2022).…”
Section: Personality Synchronization and The Interacting Partner As T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orchestrated activity of neural populations has been postulated to be one of the key mechanisms underlying brain functions 13 . At a microscopic level, individual neurons exhibit hardly predictable firing rates, with a nonnegligible stochastic component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction dynamics, contact dynamics and information flow in a corporate setting unite aspects of excitable dynamics (as in the case of rumour spreading, [44]) or synchronisation [45,46]. But also chaotic dynamics have been employed to model decision dynamics and activity in corporate settings [47][48][49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%