1991
DOI: 10.3765/bls.v17i0.1628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronic Rule Inversion

Abstract: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on The Grammar of Event Structure (1991), pp. 192-207

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, both sounds do not satisfy the primary criterion for establishing a phonological contrast: no minimal pairs can be 14 We are here observing a rather strange state of phonological affairs: a process inserts a segment, which is then deleted by another process, both of which presumably occur within the same register, namely colloquial speech. Such conflicting interaction of rules is known as ''the Duke of York gambit'' in the literature (e.g., McCarthy, 1991, Pullum, 1976. What is also peculiar about this situation in Turkish is that the underlying consonants that are deleted in these examples could very well be retained to avoid hiatus.…”
Section: Resolving Hiatus Within Words: Glide Insertionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Indeed, both sounds do not satisfy the primary criterion for establishing a phonological contrast: no minimal pairs can be 14 We are here observing a rather strange state of phonological affairs: a process inserts a segment, which is then deleted by another process, both of which presumably occur within the same register, namely colloquial speech. Such conflicting interaction of rules is known as ''the Duke of York gambit'' in the literature (e.g., McCarthy, 1991, Pullum, 1976. What is also peculiar about this situation in Turkish is that the underlying consonants that are deleted in these examples could very well be retained to avoid hiatus.…”
Section: Resolving Hiatus Within Words: Glide Insertionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One of the most common explanations for the origin of intrusive segments is rule inversion, where a segment is most likely to be inserted into the environment from which it was most frequently deleted (McCarthy, 1991). In this corpus, 44% of all instances of intrusive-s occur in a sandhi environment before a voiceless stop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Selkirk suggests the following way out of this dilemma: pronouns can be affixal clitics. She motivates this move with the phenomenon of 'intrusive -r ' in Eastern Massachusetts dialects, as observed by McCarthy (1991McCarthy ( , 1993. He showed that the '-r ' occurs at the right edges of prosodic words, as in (29-a).…”
Section: • Strong Forms Of Function Words Occur If the Function Wordmentioning
confidence: 88%