Objective
This study compares sensory-biological, cognitive-emotional, and cognitive-interpretational factors in predicting angina on an exercise treadmill test (ETT).
Methods
163 patients with ETT-induced ischemia and coronary artery disease (CAD) in the NHLBI Psychophysiological Investigations of Myocardial Ischemia (PIMI) study were given an ETT, and 79 patients reported angina during the ETT. We assessed the following as predictors of self-reported anginal pain: sensory-biological factors (β-endorphin reactivity, hot pain threshold, and maximum ST-segment depression), cognitive-emotional factors (negative affect and symptom perception), and cognitive-interpretation (self-reported history of exercise-induced angina). Models were covariate-adjusted with predictors examined individually and as part of component blocks.
Results
Logistic regression revealed that history of angina (OR=17.41, 95% CI=7.16–42.34) and negative affect (OR=1.65, 95% CI=1.17–2.34), but not maximum ST-segment depression, hot pain threshold, β-endorphin reactivity, nor symptom perception were significant predictors of angina on the ETT. The component block of sensory-biological variables was not significantly predictive of anginal pain (chi2block = 5.15, p = 0.741). However, the cognitive-emotional block (chi2block = 11.19, p = 0.004) and history of angina (cognitive-interpretation) (chi2block = 54.87, p < 0.001) were predictive of ETT angina. A model including all variables revealed that only history of angina was predictive of ETT pain (OR = 16.39, p < 0.001), although negative affect approached significance (OR = 1.45, p = 0.07).
Conclusion
These data suggest that in patients with ischemia, cognitive-emotional and cognitive-interpretational factors are important predictors of exercise angina.