1998
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb141475.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symptom duration and delay in referral for palliative radiotherapy in cancer patients: a pilot study

Abstract: ObjectiveTo estimate the frequency of delay in referral for palliative radiotherapy (PRT), and to identify factors associated with delay. DesignProspective survey over three months in 1997. SettingRadiotherapy department of a cancer centre in Melbourne, Victoria. Participants158 consecutive patients prescribed PRT in the lung, breast, urology and haematology units. Main outcome measuresDuration of symptoms; incidence of "unreasonable" delay in referral; and incidence of negative clinical outcome associated wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One concern, however, which was raised repeatedly by respondents in this study, was the waiting time for patients to receive palliative radiotherapy. 31 Moreover, there is evidence that delays in palliative radiotherapy may result in unnecessary suffering and morbidity. 30 The role of radiotherapy in the palliation of pain and other symptoms of advanced malignancy is well established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One concern, however, which was raised repeatedly by respondents in this study, was the waiting time for patients to receive palliative radiotherapy. 31 Moreover, there is evidence that delays in palliative radiotherapy may result in unnecessary suffering and morbidity. 30 The role of radiotherapy in the palliation of pain and other symptoms of advanced malignancy is well established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only 38% of all cancer patients currently receive radiotherapy in Australia (Baume 2002). Delay in referral for radiotherapy is not uncommon and occurs for these reasons: diagnostic uncertainty, incorrect prioritisation of treatment, patientrelated factors and other reasons (Wirth et al 1998). Delay in referral for radiotherapy is not uncommon and occurs for these reasons: diagnostic uncertainty, incorrect prioritisation of treatment, patientrelated factors and other reasons (Wirth et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors that affected referral included uncertainty about benefits, life expectancy, location of practice and whether the GP had previously referred patients for radiotherapy. However, delayed radiotherapy leads to poorer outcomes, neurological deterioration, persistent symptoms, and negatively impacts on the psychological health of patients (Wirth et al 1998;Kenny & Lehman 2004). However, delayed radiotherapy leads to poorer outcomes, neurological deterioration, persistent symptoms, and negatively impacts on the psychological health of patients (Wirth et al 1998;Kenny & Lehman 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients presenting for palliative radiotherapy are often of poor performance status and often have difficulty attending the radiation department for multiple visits. Delays in treatment may result in excessive and unnecessary morbidity, as well as prolonged suffering due to pain 9 . While reasons for delay are multifactorial, 10 the inherent delay in the traditional practice of RT referral, consultation, planning, and treatment is a significant factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delays in treatment may result in excessive and unnecessary morbidity, as well as prolonged suffering due to pain. 9 While reasons for delay are multifactorial, 10 the inherent delay in the traditional practice of RT referral, consultation, planning, and treatment is a significant factor. In conventional practice, patients treated with palliative radiotherapy may be required to make multiple visits to the centre for consultation, simulation and delivery of RT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%