2006
DOI: 10.1159/000090141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symptom-Based Questionnaire for Differentiating COPD and Asthma

Abstract: Background: Many patients with obstructive lung disease (OLD) carry an inaccurate diagnostic label. Symptom-based questionnaires could identify persons likely to need spirometry. Objectives: We prospectively tested questions derived from a comprehensive literature review and an international Delphi panel to help identify chronic OLD (COPD) in persons with prior evidence of OLD. Methods: Subjects were recruited via random mailing to primary-care practices in Aberdeen, Scotland, and Denver, Colorado. Persons age… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
3
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(21 reference statements)
4
56
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study assessed the usefulness of the two questionnaires as complementary method of diagnosis; in fact, neither questionnaire was designed as a diagnostic methods but rather to facilitate the differentiation of asthma and COPD once a chronic obstructive airway disease had been diagnosed. 11,17 In their study, Beeh and colleagues 17 concluded that, by means of their questionnaire, most patients with a suspected or established diagnosis of obstructive airway diseases could be classified in asthmatic or COPD groups. Despite the slight improvement achieved with the addition of spirometry results, these authors recognised that spirometry should be mandatory to support the initial diagnosis of an obstructive airway disease and to guide therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study assessed the usefulness of the two questionnaires as complementary method of diagnosis; in fact, neither questionnaire was designed as a diagnostic methods but rather to facilitate the differentiation of asthma and COPD once a chronic obstructive airway disease had been diagnosed. 11,17 In their study, Beeh and colleagues 17 concluded that, by means of their questionnaire, most patients with a suspected or established diagnosis of obstructive airway diseases could be classified in asthmatic or COPD groups. Despite the slight improvement achieved with the addition of spirometry results, these authors recognised that spirometry should be mandatory to support the initial diagnosis of an obstructive airway disease and to guide therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the slight improvement achieved with the addition of spirometry results, these authors recognised that spirometry should be mandatory to support the initial diagnosis of an obstructive airway disease and to guide therapy. On the other hand, Tinkelman and colleagues 11 found their questionnaire to be useful for patients suspected of having obstructive lung disease or those receiving respiratory medications in the absence of a specific diagnosis, although they did recognise the importance of a more efficient use of spirometry and a enhanced diagnostic accuracy to improve the overall management. On observing the poor concordance shown in the current study it was concluded that the questionnaires are of little help in addition to clinical assessment and spirometry with bronchodilator test for the differential diagnosis between asthma and COPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 Validated questionnaires have been developed to support the diagnosis of COPD. [159][160][161] Practical experience with these tools is limited and it is not yet clear how such questionnaires can best be used in clinical practice -e.g. to identify patients for spirometry, or to replace spirometry in low income countries where spirometry is not available.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Copd In Primary Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a similar validation process, this tool has been demonstrated to support diagnosis in a primary care setting [45].…”
Section: Case-finding Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%