2013
DOI: 10.1177/1757913913492931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symptom attribution and risk perception in individuals with idiopathic environmental intolerance to electromagnetic fields and in the general population

Abstract: People sensitive to EMF and recruited via an internet panel differ from people sensitive to EMF and recruited via an NGO, who reported a higher frequency of non-specific symptoms. Attribution of symptoms to EMF is one of the predictors of the intensity of physical symptoms. Changing the perceived association between EMF and health problems in individuals with IEI-EMF might contribute to a better health experience.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
15
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Their symptoms are listed in Table and their environmental sensitivities in Table . These observations are consistent with available data on EHS persons: they appear mostly as middle‐aged women, who suffer from numerous non‐specific symptoms affecting various organs or functions, and report sensitivity to many ELF and RF sources as well as other environmental factors (especially odors and chemicals) [e.g., Kato and Johansson, ; Hagström et al, ; van Dongen et al, ; Andrianome et al, ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their symptoms are listed in Table and their environmental sensitivities in Table . These observations are consistent with available data on EHS persons: they appear mostly as middle‐aged women, who suffer from numerous non‐specific symptoms affecting various organs or functions, and report sensitivity to many ELF and RF sources as well as other environmental factors (especially odors and chemicals) [e.g., Kato and Johansson, ; Hagström et al, ; van Dongen et al, ; Andrianome et al, ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, these studies of the genesis of EHS persons’ attributions have several limitations. First, their limited sample sizes preclude generalization of their results, while the recruitment of subjects via EHS activist or support groups may have caused a bias toward a severe form of IEI‐EMF [van Dongen et al, ]. Second, since these studies use qualitative interviews, they are vulnerable to recall and perception bias (e.g., subjects might remember better or grant more importance to past events consistent with their current attribution).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, there was an increasing trend in the prevalence after the first report in 1994, but recently, the prevalence seemed to be in decline. Specifically, prevalence rates in all the three countries with more than one estimate after 2006 in our meta-analysis had declined: from 13.3% in 2007 to 4.6% in 2013 in Taiwan, from 7.0% in 2009 [ 29 ] to 3.5% in 2011 [ 31 ] in the Netherlands, and from 10.0% in 2009 [ 22 ] to 7.0% in 2013 [ 22 ] in Germany (Fig. 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“… 3095/30047 Schreier et al, 2006 [ 13 ] 2004 Telephone survey Switzerland Persons were classified as EHS individuals if they reported adverse health effects from an EMF source at the time of the interview or anytime in the past. 107/2048 Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft GmbH (INFAS), 2006 [ 23 ] 2003 Telephone survey Germany Questionnaire: “Degree of anxiety and impairment due to electromagnetic fields of mobile radio, referring to different sources of electromagnetic fields, types of impairment.” 200/2500 2004 225/2500 2005 250/2502 2006 225 /2500 Lauff & Wachenfeld, 2014 [ 22 ] 2009 250/2500 2013 181/2500 Tseng et al, 2011 [ 14 ] 2007 Telephone survey Taiwan “While being near EMF sources such as mobile phone, electrical devices, or computer, will you feel allergic or sensitive?” 170/1278 Röösli et al, 2010 [ 28 ] 2008 Web-based questionnaire Switzerland “Are you electrohypersensitive?” 96/1122 2009 86/1122 van Dongen et al, 2014 [ 29 ] 2009–2010 Web-based questionn Netherlands/Amsterdam “Do you believe you are sensitive to electromagnetic fields?” 72/1009 Nordin et al, 2013 [ 27 ] 2010 Mailed questionnaire Sweden/Västerbotten The responders self-reported of having been diagnosed as IEI-EMF by a physician. 15/3406 Baliatsas et al, 2014 [ 31 ] 2011 Mailed questionnaire Netherlands “I am sensitive to mobile phone base stations and devices related to communication systems”; “I am sensitive to electrical devices.” 202/5789 <...>…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation