2011
DOI: 10.2140/agt.2011.11.1077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symplectic manifolds with vanishing action–Maslov homomorphism

Abstract: The action-Maslov homomorphism I W 1 .Ham.X; !// ! R is an important tool for understanding the topology of the Hamiltonian group of monotone symplectic manifolds. We explore conditions for the vanishing of this homomorphism, and show that it is identically zero when the Seidel element has finite order and the homology satisfies property D (a generalization of having homology generated by divisor classes). We use these results to show that I D 0 for products of projective spaces and the Grassmannian of 2 plane… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McDuff's criteria essentially require that many of the genus zero Gromov-Witten invariants of M vanish. In [4], Branson expands on McDuff's work and proves that the asymptotic spectral invariants descend in many new cases such as monotone products of complex projective spaces and the Grassmanian G (2,4).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McDuff's criteria essentially require that many of the genus zero Gromov-Witten invariants of M vanish. In [4], Branson expands on McDuff's work and proves that the asymptotic spectral invariants descend in many new cases such as monotone products of complex projective spaces and the Grassmanian G (2,4).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following is an example due to Chaput, Manivel and Perrin [7] of a homogeneous space G C /P whose quantum cohomology ring QH * (G C /P ) is not semisimple. Example 6.3 (Quantum Euler class of IG (2,6)). Let us endow C 6 with a symplectic form Ω.…”
Section: Quantum Hohomology Of G C /Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We denote by IG (2,6) the isotropic Grassmannian of isotropic 2-planes in C 6 . The dimension of IG (2,6) is equal to 7.…”
Section: Quantum Hohomology Of G C /Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abusing the notation we will denote the resulting (partial) Calabi quasi-morphism on Ham (M ) also by µ a . The list of manifolds for which µ a is known to descend to Ham (M ) for all a includes symplectically aspherical manifolds [61], complex projective spaces [20] and their monotone products [20,13], a monotone blow-up of CP 2 at three points and the complex Grassmannian Gr(2, 4) [13]. The list of manifolds for which it is known that µ a does not descend to Ham (M ) at least for some a includes various symplectic toric manifolds and, in particular, the monotone blow-ups of CP 2 at one or two points [23,54].…”
Section: Example 33 ([20]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, to certain Lagrangian submanifolds L of M one can associate the quantum homology (or the Lagrangian Floer homology) QH(L) that comes with an open-closed map i L : QH(L) → QH(M ) [3,8,30,31]. 13 , and if i L (x) divides an idempotent a ∈ QH(M ), then L is a-superheavy -this is shown in [23] in the monotone case, cf. [8,30,31].…”
Section: Theorem 42 ([23]mentioning
confidence: 99%