2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00029-013-0146-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symplectic embeddings of polydisks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the choices made in the splitting construction, this plane is moreover asymptotic to a geodesic on L for the flat metric. The totality of the one-dimensional family of such planes is shown to form a smoothly embedded solid torus having boundary equal to L. Here we need the automatic transversality result [55] by C. Wendl together with the asymptotic intersection results shown in [28] by R. Hind and S. Lisi. We also make heavy use of positivity of intersection for pseudoholomorphic curves; see the work [36] by D. McDuff.…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By the choices made in the splitting construction, this plane is moreover asymptotic to a geodesic on L for the flat metric. The totality of the one-dimensional family of such planes is shown to form a smoothly embedded solid torus having boundary equal to L. Here we need the automatic transversality result [55] by C. Wendl together with the asymptotic intersection results shown in [28] by R. Hind and S. Lisi. We also make heavy use of positivity of intersection for pseudoholomorphic curves; see the work [36] by D. McDuff.…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The splitting construction applied to the unit normal bundle of a Lagrangian submanifold has previously been used in [16,Theorem 1.7.5], [27], [14], [28], and [10], among others. Manifestly, it is an efficient tool for obtaining strong obstructions to Lagrangian embeddings inside uniruled symplectic manifolds.…”
Section: The Splitting Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, if there is a symplectic embedding P (1, 1) → E(a, 2a), then ECH capacities only imply that a 1, but the Ekeland-Hofer capacities imply that a 3 2 ; see [5,Remark 1.8]. Another example is that if there is a symplectic embedding from P (1,2) into the ball B(c), then both ECH capacities and Ekeland-Hofer capacities only imply that c 2; but in fact it was recently shown by Hind-Lisi [3] that c 3. In particular, the inclusions P (1, 1) → E( 3 2 , 3) and P (1, 2) → B (3) are 'optimal' in the following sense.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%