1995
DOI: 10.2307/2410271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sympatric Convergence and Environmental Correlation between Two Land-Snail Species

Abstract: In the southern Appalachian region of North America, the phylogenetically convergent shells of the polygyrid snails Triodopsinae Neohelix major (Binney) and Polygyrinae Mesodon normalis (Pilsbry) are even more convergent in size and shape in sympatry (7 sites) than in allopatry (23 and 10 sites). Environmental correlations account for 34% and 30% of size and shape variations in N. major (larger, taller, and more loosely coiled at northern, high-altitude, sheltered sites), but for only 14% and 9% in M. normalis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The shell is particularly useful in investigations of evolution and ecology, in being species‐specific yet malleable in both form and size by environment (e.g. Goodfriend, 1986; Emberton, 1994; 1995a; Chiba, 1996) within measurable developmental constraints (e.g. Gould, 1992), and with the individuals’ entire ontogeny conserved and on display in the shell of the mature animal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shell is particularly useful in investigations of evolution and ecology, in being species‐specific yet malleable in both form and size by environment (e.g. Goodfriend, 1986; Emberton, 1994; 1995a; Chiba, 1996) within measurable developmental constraints (e.g. Gould, 1992), and with the individuals’ entire ontogeny conserved and on display in the shell of the mature animal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This translates into a deeper leaf litter layer, a more closed canopy, and lower temperature ( Table I). As in other instances (SHIMEK 1930, BOYCOTT 1934, CAIN 1977, CLARKE et al 1978, TILLIER 1981, EMBERTON 1995b, COOK 1997, WELTER-SCHULTES 2000, TESHIMA et al 2003, better conservation certainly influences the environmental conditions overall, including leaf litter quality, structure, humidity, and depth, which in turn influence mollusk morphology (GOULD 1968, PEAKE 1978, CIPRIANI 2007 In the present study, the smallest mean values were obtained for specimens collected from the Parnaioca Trail area (Table II), the most disturbed of the three areas (shallower leaf litter, more open canopy, higher temperature). The lower capacity of the local leaf litter to retain water is likely responsible for the smaller size of the snails.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…It is not surprising that we find two snail lineages living in the same drainage system under the same environmental conditions converging on a similar shell morphological ''type.'' Convergence in shell morphology has been found in a number of snail genera (Boulding 1990;Emberton 1995b) and has been a repeated observation within Oreohelix (Pilsbry 1916;Henderson 1924). Pilsbry (1916) noted that Oreohelix is a difficult genus with which to work because of the multiplicity of forms and the parallelism of shell characters between species or races not directly related to one another.…”
Section: Molecular and Shell Morphological Discordancementioning
confidence: 79%