1947
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-194712000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sympathectomy for Obliterative Arterial Disease; Indications and Contraindications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1950
1950
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paradoxical finding is probably due to a " borrowing " phenomenon, all or most of the available blood in the lower limb being short-circuited through the dilated vessels of the thigh and calf. A similar phenomenon has been noted after lumbar sympathectomy in some patients with severe ischaemia of the feet (Freeman, Leeds, and Gardner, 1947). In such cases intra-arterial vasodilator substances of any variety are clearly contraindicated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This paradoxical finding is probably due to a " borrowing " phenomenon, all or most of the available blood in the lower limb being short-circuited through the dilated vessels of the thigh and calf. A similar phenomenon has been noted after lumbar sympathectomy in some patients with severe ischaemia of the feet (Freeman, Leeds, and Gardner, 1947). In such cases intra-arterial vasodilator substances of any variety are clearly contraindicated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…A rise in temperature of 1 to 2° Celcius has been considered by many to be the minimum if lumbar sympathectomy is to be undertaken. Thus, Atlas8, Freeman et al 9 and Nyström10 maintain that in cases with less rise in temperature, or even a drop in it, the operation may have a deleterious effect and sometimes be followed by gangrene. On the other hand White and associatesll think that a good result can be predicted regardless of the effect of the lumbar ganglion block on the skin temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can still get poor clinical results in association with therapy that has resulted in an increase of total blood flow to an extremity (15,16). Whether repeated intra-arterial injections of Priscoline would give the lasting benefit noted in the case of intraarterial histamine by Mufson (9) is conjectural.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%