“…For the definition of cooperative systems and applications of the method of moving plane to cooperative systems, we refer to Troy [22] (for bounded domains) and Busca-Sirakov [5] (for the whole R N ). See also Lin-Zhang [16] for the Liouville system which is cooperative.…”
We analyze the asymptotic behavior of blowing up solutions for the SU(3) Toda system in a bounded domain. We prove that there is no boundary blow-up point, and that the blow-up set can be localized by the Green function.
“…For the definition of cooperative systems and applications of the method of moving plane to cooperative systems, we refer to Troy [22] (for bounded domains) and Busca-Sirakov [5] (for the whole R N ). See also Lin-Zhang [16] for the Liouville system which is cooperative.…”
We analyze the asymptotic behavior of blowing up solutions for the SU(3) Toda system in a bounded domain. We prove that there is no boundary blow-up point, and that the blow-up set can be localized by the Green function.
“…We mention that in case p(N −2), q(N −2) < (N +2) and p, q > 1, then it follows from [17, Theorem 2.1] that solutions decay at infinity; as a consequence, according to [6,Theorem 2], in this case both u and v are radially symmetric and radially decreasing with respect to some point. We do not know whether this conclusion holds under the mere assumptions of Theorem 1.9.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
Abstract. We study an elliptic system of the form Lu = |v| p−1 v and Lv = |u| q−1 u in Ω with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition, where Lu := −Δu in the case of a bounded domain and Lu := −Δu + u in the cases of an exterior domain or the whole space R N . We analyze the existence, uniqueness, sign and radial symmetry of ground state solutions and also look for sign changing solutions of the system. More general non-linearities are also considered.
“…This follows similarly as in [16, Theorem 2.1] and therefore we omit the proof. We just mention that the conclusion relies on the fact that every positive solutions u, v of the system (3.4) lying in H 1 (R N ) are radially symmetric with respect to some point z 0 ∈ R N (see [4,Theorem 2]). The proof also uses an argument based on the information on the Morse index of the solutions (u j , v j ), similar to the one in Lemma 3.3 below.…”
Section: Lemma 31 We Have That ρ J → ∞ As J → ∞mentioning
Abstract. We consider a system of the form −ε 2 ∆u + u = g(v), −ε 2 ∆v + v = f (u) in Ω with Dirichlet boundary condition on ∂Ω, where Ω is a smooth bounded domain in R N , N 3 and f, g are power-type nonlinearities having superlinear and subcritical growth at infinity. We prove that the least energy solutions to such a system concentrate, as ε goes to zero, at a point of Ω which maximizes the distance to the boundary of Ω.2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35J50, 35J55, 38E05.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.