2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.92.046803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetry of Two-Terminal Nonlinear Electric Conduction

Abstract: The well-established symmetry relations for linear transport phenomena cannot, in general, be applied in the nonlinear regime. Here we propose a set of symmetry relations with respect to bias voltage and magnetic field for the nonlinear conductance of two-terminal electric conductors. We experimentally confirm these relations using phase-coherent, semiconductor quantum dots.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At zero magnetic field, it is well known that the absence of spatial symmetry leads to nonlinear terms in the conductance that are asymmetric in V [3]. Only very recently has a distinct nonlinear term attracted attention that leads to an asymmetry of the conductance in the presence of both finite B and V [4,5]. The contribution of electron-electron interaction to this asymmetry was calculated to lowest order for disordered [6] and ballistic [7] phase-coherent conductors for a magnetic flux smaller than one flux quantum Φ o = h/e, and for bias voltages, V smaller than the characteristic energy scale of the system (typically µeV in semiconductor billiards).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At zero magnetic field, it is well known that the absence of spatial symmetry leads to nonlinear terms in the conductance that are asymmetric in V [3]. Only very recently has a distinct nonlinear term attracted attention that leads to an asymmetry of the conductance in the presence of both finite B and V [4,5]. The contribution of electron-electron interaction to this asymmetry was calculated to lowest order for disordered [6] and ballistic [7] phase-coherent conductors for a magnetic flux smaller than one flux quantum Φ o = h/e, and for bias voltages, V smaller than the characteristic energy scale of the system (typically µeV in semiconductor billiards).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Billiards were defined using electron beam lithography and deep wet-etching of the 2-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) formed in a GaInAs/InP heterostructure (Fermi energy = 35 meV) [10]. This system was chosen for its high shape fidelity in billiard definition [5,10] and because previous studies have shown it exhibits negligible circuit-induced asymmetry ('selfgating'), permitting careful control of device and conductance symmetry [4,5]. Device dimensions were made to be smaller than the electron mean free path such that transport within the billiard was ballistic (see Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, general properties can be inferred from symmetry considerations. Onsager's relations for linear response [34][35][36] and their generalization to the nonlinear regime [37][38][39] determine the symmetry of the response functions. For a leftright symmetric device in the absence of a magnetic field, the I -V characteristics is odd, i.e., I (−V ) = −I (V ) and g (0) 2 = 0.…”
Section: Tip-induced Symmetry Breakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Several recent works have been devoted to the study of mechanisms for breaking Onsager symmetry in the nonlinear conductance theoretically 39 as well as in several experimental settings. 40,41 In most of these cases, the source for the asymmetric behavior of the current as a function of dc was identified to be the effective voltage profile induced along the biased structure as a consequence of the Coulomb interaction. In the case of rings threaded by dc fluxes while biased by ac voltages, there are also experimental results, which are supported by semiclassical theoretical arguments, indicating that the Onsager-Casimir relations are in general not valid for the conductance associated to the rectified current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%