2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetry energy III: Isovector skins

Abstract: Isoscalar density is a sum of neutron and proton densities and isovector is a normalized difference.Here, we report on the experimental evidence for the displacement of the isovector and isoscalar surfaces in nuclei, by ∼0.9 fm from each other. We analyze data on quasielastic (QE) charge exchange (p,n) reactions, concurrently with proton and neutron elastic scattering data for the same target nuclei, following the concepts of the isoscalar and isovector potentials combined into Lane optical potential. The elas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
4
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One therefore finds 0.12 fm<r np <0.28 fm, independent of assumptions concerning S 0 . While this is consistent with most experimental results for 208 Pb, r np =0.159±0.041 (Danielewicz & Lee 2009) (but see Danielewicz et al (2017), who find r np =0.223 ± 0.018 fm), the most recent neutron-skin thickness measurement from the PREX experiment (Abrahamyan et al 2012 fm and thus the mean value is larger than our upper bound. The proposed PREX-II experiment will have an estimated error in r np of about ±0.06 fm Figure 13.…”
Section: Neutron-star Radii and Neutron-skin Thicknessessupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One therefore finds 0.12 fm<r np <0.28 fm, independent of assumptions concerning S 0 . While this is consistent with most experimental results for 208 Pb, r np =0.159±0.041 (Danielewicz & Lee 2009) (but see Danielewicz et al (2017), who find r np =0.223 ± 0.018 fm), the most recent neutron-skin thickness measurement from the PREX experiment (Abrahamyan et al 2012 fm and thus the mean value is larger than our upper bound. The proposed PREX-II experiment will have an estimated error in r np of about ±0.06 fm Figure 13.…”
Section: Neutron-star Radii and Neutron-skin Thicknessessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Excluded regions are shown by shading. Left panel: Experimental constraints are from Lattimer & Lim (2013) and Lattimer & Steiner (2014), supplemented by isobaric analog states and isovector skin (IAS+ΔR) results from Danielewicz et al (2017). The thick dashed curve shows the analytic bound from Equation ( physical correlations between the parameters.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are best fit with a neutron-skin thickness of 0.249± 0.023 fm, but larger values also give acceptable reproductions of these data. A recent analysis of (p, n) chargeexchange scattering data also points to the possibility of a larger neutron skin [32]. These skin thicknesses are large compared to recent ab initio calculations of 0.12-0.15 fm from [30].…”
Section: Our P+mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The density region of the outer core, 0.5ρ0 to 3ρ0, is similar to that found in the nuclear matter environment. Here, we use the Skyrme interactions (blue curves) [27,47,48] [3]. Five interactions, KDE0v1, LNS, NRAPR, SKRA, QMC700, deemed as the best in Ref.…”
Section: Neutron-star Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%