2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
160
3
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
160
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with attractiveness theory because long-nosed faces are less attractive than short-nosed ones [5,6] and agreeing to requests has been negatively related to physical attractiveness [8]. Attractiveness theory is based on an ecolutionary perspective, according to which we have evolved so that attractiveness confers advantages [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with attractiveness theory because long-nosed faces are less attractive than short-nosed ones [5,6] and agreeing to requests has been negatively related to physical attractiveness [8]. Attractiveness theory is based on an ecolutionary perspective, according to which we have evolved so that attractiveness confers advantages [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The nose, particularly its length, has been related to attractiveness [5][6][7], and people with longer noses are perceived as less attractive than people with shorter noses. Because compliance is positively related to attractiveness [8], it was predicted that participants would be less likely to pass the salt to person with long nose compared to person with short (normal) nose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fixed set of points was marked on each face using the mouse (figure 1). These points indicated the shape and position of internal features that were similar to those used in other studies ( Jones 1995;Baudouin & Tiberghien 2004). The width, height, length and thickness of the features were all determined by computing the distance between two points.…”
Section: R E T R a C T E Dmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to the current theories of evolutionary psychology, the esthetic assessment of adult faces depends on various combinations of averageness, symmetry, neoteny (babyness) and youthfulness, and sexual dimorphism [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Additionally, facial expression (happiness, excitement, arousal) and grooming (successful adaptation, status) concur to a global positive assessment [21].…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%