2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetry and repetition in perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To start, note that it is true that symmetric objects yield a symmetric projection on the retina only if viewed head-on. However, the degradation of 2D symmetry induced by perspective is gradual and systematic [27][28][29][30]. For instance, as Figure 2d,e illustrates, the lines connecting symmetric elements are not parallel any more under perspective distortion, but adjacent lines are still approximately parallel.…”
Section: The Role Of Symmetry Processing In Perceptual Organizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To start, note that it is true that symmetric objects yield a symmetric projection on the retina only if viewed head-on. However, the degradation of 2D symmetry induced by perspective is gradual and systematic [27][28][29][30]. For instance, as Figure 2d,e illustrates, the lines connecting symmetric elements are not parallel any more under perspective distortion, but adjacent lines are still approximately parallel.…”
Section: The Role Of Symmetry Processing In Perceptual Organizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Specifically, this process would require that the visual system first obtain an estimate of slant from available depth cues to mentally rotate (normalize) the image to the frontoparallel plane where regularity detection could proceed unhindered (on this mentally rotated image, rather than the retinal image). Others however, have suggested that during perspective distortions, the remaining regularities in the retinal image are sufficient for symmetry detection to take place, without requiring normalization, a process typically referred to as the retinal structure account of symmetry processing (Jenkins, 1983; van der Vloed et al, 2005; Wagemans et al, 1993). Attempts to discern between these two putative mechanisms have returned equivocal conclusions in the psychophysical literature however, and we refer the interested reader to the study by van der Vloed et al (2005) for an excellent discussion on the topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be because symmetry analysis follows an effortful and potentially time-consuming normalization process [78], or because symmetry analysis is based on the degraded structure in the retinal image after slanting. Van der Vloed, Csathó and van der Helm [79] argued in favour of the retinal structure hypothesis, and against the normalization hypothesis.…”
Section: Question Four: Is the Neural Response To Symmetry View Invarmentioning
confidence: 99%