2016
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2016.2617335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetrical Constructions for Regular Girth-8 QC-LDPC Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 8, we compare the performance of BC 3 with some commonly used methods from the literature. The (J, K)-regular codes in [29,30] are generated by carrying out complete enumeration, which is the common method for code generation in the telecommunications literature, for the mentioned (m, n) dimensions in Table 8. There are several criteria to pick the best LDPC code: small (m, n) dimensions and regular degree distributions (easier hardware implementation), small (J, K) values (faster decoding with a sparse code), and high girth g (better error correction).…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Table 8, we compare the performance of BC 3 with some commonly used methods from the literature. The (J, K)-regular codes in [29,30] are generated by carrying out complete enumeration, which is the common method for code generation in the telecommunications literature, for the mentioned (m, n) dimensions in Table 8. There are several criteria to pick the best LDPC code: small (m, n) dimensions and regular degree distributions (easier hardware implementation), small (J, K) values (faster decoding with a sparse code), and high girth g (better error correction).…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 8, we consider the (J, K), (m, n), and g parameters used in [29,30], and implement our BC 3 method to solve the instances to optimality without any time limitations. We do not utilize Polish heuristic, since there is no solution pool.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, QC-LDPC codes with girth 8, whose parity-check matrices have some symmetries, and are in many cases shorter than previously existing girth-8 QC-LDPC codes, were constructed in [29]. We tested the codes of [29], and observed that our proposed algorithm can find the exact s min , or obtain lower and upper bounds on s min , for many of them in a matter of seconds or minutes. For example, we have found the stopping distances of all 18 codes with d v = 3, g = 8,…”
Section: B Upper Bound On the Stopping Distance Of Ldpc Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R ≤ 0.88 and n ≤ 4000 (Table I of [29]), each in less than or about one minute. The last code in that table is C 13 in Table V.…”
Section: B Upper Bound On the Stopping Distance Of Ldpc Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in [8] that the complexity of exhaustively checking equations of the type (2) goes exponentially high by increasing each one of the parameters m, n or N . Solutions with reduced complexity where proposed, for example, in [9], [10], but the corresponding design methods result in g = 8.…”
Section: Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%