2009
DOI: 10.1021/ci900185z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetric Structures in the Universe of Protein Folds

Abstract: Insights in structural biology can be gained by analyzing protein architectures and characterizing their structural similarities. Current computational approaches enable a comparison of a variety of structural and physicochemical properties in protein space. Here we describe the automated detection of rotational symmetries within a representative set of nearly 10,000 nonhomologous protein structures. To find structural symmetries in proteins initially, equivalent pairs of secondary structure elements (SSE), i.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data for SymD 1.3hw3 and GANGSTA+, in addition to the list of SCOP domains, is taken from supplemental 3 of Kim et al [38]. The best-performing methods for each fold are in bold. 1 The number of superfamilies in the fold 2 CE-Symm using TM-score ≥ 0.4 and requiring order ≥ 2 3 CE-Symm using TM-score ≥ 0.4 4 SymD using Z-score ≥ 8 (recommended by authors) 5 SymD using Z-score ≥ 10 (recommended by authors) 6 The unpublished SymD version 1.5b using TM-score ≥ 0.4 7 GANGSTA+ using FSAR(fraction of sequentially aligned residues) ≥ 0.8, which the authors recommend [37] …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Data for SymD 1.3hw3 and GANGSTA+, in addition to the list of SCOP domains, is taken from supplemental 3 of Kim et al [38]. The best-performing methods for each fold are in bold. 1 The number of superfamilies in the fold 2 CE-Symm using TM-score ≥ 0.4 and requiring order ≥ 2 3 CE-Symm using TM-score ≥ 0.4 4 SymD using Z-score ≥ 8 (recommended by authors) 5 SymD using Z-score ≥ 10 (recommended by authors) 6 The unpublished SymD version 1.5b using TM-score ≥ 0.4 7 GANGSTA+ using FSAR(fraction of sequentially aligned residues) ≥ 0.8, which the authors recommend [37] …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 GANGSTA+ using FSAR(fraction of sequentially aligned residues) ≥ 0.8, which the authors recommend [37] …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MASS (5), TOPOFIT (6), SCALI (7), GANGSTA (8,9) and others (10,11). Recently, GANGSTA+ (12) was introduced and we presented several applications such as the detection of non-sequential structural analogs for novel protein folds (12), the detection of symmetric (13) and circular permuted (14,15) protein structures in the protein databases and a large-scale evaluation of all-against-all sequence and structure alignments (16). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this is rarely the case (unless we are comparing backbone atoms) and thus some kind of atom mapping is required to establish atom equivalence. In the same context, frequently forgotten issues are resolving positional equivalence of atoms in side chains allowing symmetry ambiguity [1] or accounting for internal symmetry [2-7]. Another key issue is the comparison of proteins with flexible regions or partial overlap, where a direct RMSD calculation provides an unrealistic measure of the similarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%